Report: President Trump takes into account executive order that restrict zero payments

President Trump signed 141 executive orders in the first 100 days of his second term. There is still one in the pipeline that could offer a thrust for most, if not all 134 FBS schools of the NCAA.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the President consider An executive order “could increase the explosion of payments to college athletes since 2021.”

The seed was apparently planted during a Thursday meeting between the president and the former coach of Alabama, Nick Saban, who stopped after the 2023 season because he frustrated (let's call it, what it is) his inability to continue to stack the deck with all top players.

According to the report, Trump said that he agreed to Saban and would look at the creation of an executive regulation. “

While it was popular for people like Saban, to complain about the effects of College football players who finally achieve real value for their skills, efforts and victims (and if they don't believe that they are victims, speak to Jordan Travis), why should a branch of the government branch of a person injure to be paid for?

Will there be an executive order that limits the amount of money that can make CEOs? Actor? Musician?

Will there be an executive order that restricts the ability of the rich and navigation on the investment markets in a way that generates massive financial gear highlights?

For everyone who believes in free companies, this is as free as companies. Companies compete for non-employees who help them achieve their goals. The companies that consistently make bad decisions will fail. The companies that consistently make good decisions will thrive. It is the essence of the American path.

The current chaos in College football flows directly from decades of the various schools that use the wrong umbrella of the NCAA to limit what the players can receive. The legislative department spoke about this matter more than 130 years ago and created the first antitrust laws. The judicial department, which has stimulated the entire system through lengthy legal disputes that the entire system questioned, has finally applied these laws to a number of artificial rules that had a antitrust injury that is hidden in sight.

The moment arrived four years ago. Players who have paid for the ability to pay for what they bring to the college football table for a long time. The schools that were able to take advantage of these players for far too long.

Now the executive will reverse the work of the other two branches? For what purpose? Who wins and who loses?

If the congress gives college football a partially or complete antitrust exemption, then it is the case. If the schools decide (as you should), to consider the non-workers' employees and to consider a nationwide union that would lead to a work company that would lead to a variety of rules that aim to meet a proper balance, i.e., so to speak.

Regardless of whether the president is a democrat, republican, independent, libertarian or whig, is the idea that a manager should or could restrict the ability of college soccer players to earn what someone would pay for it, despite the government's three-industry system, until it is used to others), “make too much money”, create a terrible double.