Rochester Racial Slur Video: The police have an investigation into prosecutors

Rochester, Minn. (Fox 9) – – After a video of a woman became viral who was accused of using a racist slur against a child in Rochester, Minnesota, a rally took place on Monday when the police ended their investigation into the video.

Rochester Rassial Slur Video

What we know:

The video shows a woman who holds a child who is confronted by the man who takes up her. The man who spoke from the camera's point of view asks the woman whether she called another child on the playground the “n-word”.

The woman goes away before turning over and calls the man the “n-word” and makes gesture.

“He took my son's things,” said the woman when the man pressed her.

“That gives you the right, the child, 5 years old, a *****, the 'n-word?' To name? “Said the man.

“If he gets like this,” said the woman.

Big Picture View:

The Tikok clip was posted on Thursday with its comment by the user “Tizzyent” and has more than 10.5 million views on Friday.

Since then, waves have made it online and all over the world. It also led to donation efforts for the family and for the woman who used the slur.

Local perspective:

At a rally on Monday, demonstrators condemned racism in their community and will ask the prosecutors to take measures.

In a statement on Monday, the Rochester police announced that she had completed his examination of the video. They say their results were submitted to the Rochester public prosecutor in order to check and take into account an indictment decision.

“RPD takes all reports and allegations seriously and must collect information thoroughly to ensure a proper procedure,” says the police declaration. “We acknowledge that the behavior recorded in the video has expressed many concerns and we appreciate the patience of the community during the investigation and forward.”

It is unclear what crimes the prosecutors weigh.

Is it illegal to use a racist slur?

Grab deeper:

Although it is inappropriate, the use of its own racial slave itself is not a crime.

Hass speeches are generally protected under the first change. However, if someone commits another crime (like an attack or a murder) that is motivated by hatred, it can be seen as a hate crime.

“If the suspect is in the process of committing another crime and giving the victim a derogatory name, this does not automatically mean that it is a hate crime,” explains a posting of the St. Paul police. “If the incident does not turn out to be a crime, the police often cannot take much enforcement measures.”

The contribution continues: “If it is found that there is no directly enforceable measures from the police, this does not mean that it is not the case with what happened to them. Sometimes you have the opportunity to take a civil law reason for the suspect, which has a lower burden on evidence than the criminal enforcement.” Action. “

Rochester crime and public security