Prince Andrew, who was tied to PPE scandal -millionaire

Prince Andrews shady business complaints related to PPE scandal millionaires.

Prince Andrew's already clouded reputation is again under the closer to Doug Barrowman, the controversial millionaire in the center of the PS era of the British PSA era. The BBC has discovered that one of Andrew's most important undertakings, Pitch@palace globalwas managed by a company controlled by Barrowman for two years, Knox House Trustee (Great Britain)– according to official rejection of a business relationship between the two men.

After the infamous 2019 of the prince News night Interview – where he tried to accusations in connection with Jeffrey Epstein-The property of his international start-up competition was quietly shifted to the company connected by Barrowman. Although Prince Andrew had control, official submissions show that Knox House Trustee (Great Britain) became the legal owner in 2021 and acted in his name as a “candidate” part of a long -term royal practice, and opaque structures to be used to cover up direct property.

Barrowman and his wife, Baroness Michelle Mone, made headlines after being known that they misled the public and the parliament via their connections to PPE MedPro, a company that gave massive government contracts during the pandemic. Mone finally admitted that they had lied because of their engagement. The National Crime Agency is now investigating the law firm for potential crimes. Barrowman denies any misconduct – but the revelations only deepen the concerns about the judgment of Prince Andrew in the selection of business partners.

The latest: Carney's shocking victory: How Hass on Trump has transformed a lost campaign into a historical victory.

Above all, Knox House Trustee (Great Britain) was checked by Barrowman via the Isle of Man -registration by 2023 Knox Limited. In 2023, ownership of Arthur Lancaster was transferred – another number with tight relationships with both the prince and the Barrowman. The name of Lancaster also appears in connection with AML Tax (UK), a company that is fined by a fine Hmrc For aggressive promotion of tax avoidance systems. A judge later described Lancaster as “evasive” and his evidence “significantly inconsistent” – words for someone who has now been commissioned to manage the prince's business interests.

Although Prince Andrew is officially listed as a “significant influence or control” Pitch@palace globalHe never owned the company directly. Instead, it has passed between trustworthy agents – for the first time, its former private secretary, then the outfit of Barrowman and now Lancaster. This network of nominated and shell-like companies raises obvious questions: Why should you make an effort in order to hide control over an apparently no longer existing start-up competition? What is really hidden?

In the meantime, Pitch@palace globalHis ability to connect global entrepreneurs with investors have once been withdrawn from public life since Andrew. But interest. At the beginning of this year, a Dutch company expressed the desire to acquire it and quoted the “immense value” of the network. One can only ask what this value really represents – and whether it is more tied to the prince's connections than any real business potential.

Last thoughts – everything comes out in the laundry

This involved network of royal influence, offshore ownership and shammer millionaires requires real accountability. Prince Andrew's continued collaboration with questionable personalities such as Doug Barrowman and Arthur Lancaster should deal with everyone who believes that the trust of the public and transparency is still important.

These are not isolated misconceptions, reflect a behavior pattern that aims at dodging, confidentiality and self-preservation. In criminal investigations and public suspicion of assembly, the truth must come to light. The British public deserves to know what is really behind these opaque structures and whether a member of the royal family has used privileges to properly protect financial business.