Man who was killed in Valley Road Rage Shooting

Chandler, Az – Christopher Pelkey ​​was killed in Chandler in Chandler in 2021, but last month the artificial intelligence awakened him while convicting his murderer.

It was the first time in Arizona judicial history – and possibly nationwide – that AI was used to create the effects of a deceased victim.

Pelkey's sister and brother-in-law used the technology to reproduce his image and voice to “speak” with the courtroom about his life and on the day he met Gabriel Paul Horcasitas, who shot him near Gilbert and Germann-Straßen during a confrontation.

“We could probably have been friends in another life,” said the AI ​​creation of the 37-year-old army-erana, who dealt with Horcasitas. “I believe in forgiveness …”

The AI ​​video also contained real video clips from videos that were recorded during his time, as well as some of his personality and humor while showing a real photo that he once taken with an “old -age time”.

“This is the best that I can ever give you what I would have looked like if I had the chance to grow old,” said Pelkey's AI version. “Remember to grow old is a gift that not everyone has, so hug it and stop it to worry about these wrinkles.”

Stacey Wales, Pelkey's sister, said everyone who knew Pelkey, “agreed that this capture was a true representation of the mind and the soul, as Chris was thinking about his own conviction as a murder victim.”

The family says that the judge was moved by the mighty video in such a way that in his final statements he even pointed out this in the conviction and distributed the maximum 10.5-year prison sentence for Horcasitas.

Pelkey's family was looking for justice and found some peace. Especially how one of Stacey's children reacted to see Uncle Chris again.

“Mom and dad thank you for doing that. I had to hear from Uncle Chris one last time. And that meant so much, thank you.” This is not what this should do.

Supreme judge Timmer offered the following answer:

AI has the potential to create great efficiency in the judicial system, and can better represent their positions that are not taught in the law. For this reason, we look forward to the potential of AI. AI can also hinder justice or even get up if they are used inappropriately. A measured approach is best. In this sense, the court has formed a KI committee to check the AI ​​usage and to make recommendations for how best to use. Basically, those who use AI – including dishes – are responsible for their accuracy.