The Supreme Court allows Trump to implement transgender military ban

Washington – the Supreme Court allowed President Donald Trump on Tuesday, his ban on transgender people who serve in the military.

The judges made an emergency request from the Trump government to increase a nationwide interim decision that blocked the directive while the legal dispute continued.

The short arrangement of the court found that the three liberal judges were resisted.

Follow live politic's reporting here

The decision is a loss for the seven individual transgender service members, led by the senior plaintiff Emily Shilling, a navy commander who had sued to block it.

“No longer trans @ dod,” said Defense Minister Pete Hegseth in a contribution to X. In a separate Ministry of Defense from the past on Tuesday before the decision was issued, Hegseth was seen in a video that said: “No more types in clothes. We are done with it.”

According to the Ministry of Defense, there are currently a little more than 4,000 transgender employees who are currently serving the military, although some activists have set the number to much higher. There are a total of around 2.1 million active service members.

“Today's judgment of the Supreme Court is a devastating blow for members of the transgender service who demonstrated their skills and commitment to the defense of our nation,” said the Lambda Legal and Human Rights Campaign Foundation, two groups that represent the plaintiffs in a joint statement.

Politics “have nothing to do with military willingness and all prejudices,” added the groups.

In a separate case, a judge in Washington, DC, also blocked politics nationwide, but the US Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit temporarily put this decision on hold, while he heard arguments about whether they should be blocked more permanently. The Court has not yet ruled.

The guideline announced in February is a much more comprehensive ban than a similar proposal that was implemented during the first Trump office. It “generally disqualifies people with military service who have gender -specific dysphoria or have subjected medical interventions for gender dysphoria,” said Attorney General D. John Sauer in court files.

Sauer asked the Supreme Court to intervene and said that the judges had to prove “essential respect” of the Ministry of Defense on military issues.

In the implementation of politics, the government was based on a Pentagon report from the first Trump term, in which people with a gender dysphoria represent a threat to “military effectiveness and lethality”.

The challengers argued in court that the ban violates the 14th amendment to the constitution, which obliges that the laws apply equally and other constitutional provisions.

Members of the Transgender Service have shown in recent years that they can serve as well as everyone else, said their lawyers in court files. The then President Joe Biden had rolled back the previous Limitations of Trump.

“An unprecedented degree of animus compared to transgender people encourages and penetrates the ban: it is based on the shocking statement that transgender people do not exist,” the lawyers wrote.

A federal judge in the state of Washington blocked politics on March 27 and said: “It is not a particularly close question.” The 9th US Court of Court based in San Francisco rejected the decision to put the decision on ice and prompted the Trump government to contact the Supreme Court.