close
close
Harvard University is killed at its DEI office, as its battle with the Trump government runs on more fronts

Harvard University is killed at its DEI office, as its battle with the Trump government runs on more fronts

by



Cnn
–

Hours after the Harvard University was brought to the court for the first time to restore more than 2 billion US dollars of blocked federal financing, the country's oldest and richest college made a symbolic arc in front of the white house to rename its diversity, equity and inclusion offices.

The change was announced on Monday in an e -mail to the campus community by the head of the office for justice, diversity, inclusion and belonging. It nods on a comprehensive exertion of President Donald Trump to eliminate the practices that are to be carried out to promote racial, gender, class and other representations in public spaces as “illegal and immoral discrimination”.

“We have to focus our focus on promoting connections across the difference, create spaces for dialogue and cultivate a culture of belonging – not as an abstract ideal, but as a lived experience for everyone,” wrote Sherri Ann Charleston by Harvard. “In order to grasp this emphasis and this mission, our office will immediately live a community and campus life.”

Harvard further announced on Monday that there would be no celebrations for the affinity group during the beginning, the school led by the school, The Harvard Crimson, reported the school, and quoted an email that Charleston was sent to affinity groups on this day. The decision was made after the Ministry of Education threatened the funding of the funding if Harvard could not cancel the final celebrations that the students could separate due to the race, she reported.

The Trump administration also announced on Monday that it initiated investigations into the Harvard Law Review and said that the authorities had received symptoms of breed-based discrimination.

“The article selection of Harvard Law Review seems to choose the winner and loser based on the breed, whereby a prey system is used in which the breed of the lawyer is as important as the merit of the submission,” said the deputy deputy secretary for civil rights, Craig Trainor, in a statement.

The student legal journal is one of the most venerable and influential in the US legal profession. Former President Barack Obama among his former leaders. The Trump administration says that it is being examined whether authors who submitted the letter to the case examination were preferred due to their breed.

CNN made the Harvard Law Review for a comment on Tuesday.

The developments on Monday when Harvard's Multifront fight with the White House came to court for both sides on the same day since the school in its federal research financing sued for freezing of 2.2 billion US dollars was the largest of the largest of these breaks, which are also available on other Elite -US -Colleges due to political ideology in university formation.

Harvard's president in an open letter dated April 14 had stated that the school would not change a broad policy that the White House of University demanded across the country, including the elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion programs. “The university will not give up its independence and not give up its constitutional rights,” wrote Alan Garber.

<p> CNNS Zain Asher and Bianna Golodryga talk to Jon Fansmith, the Senior Vice President for government relationships and national commitment to the American Council on Education, about the Harvard and the Trump government, which are now on trial. </p> <p>“Class =” Image__Dam-IMAGE__DAM-IMG- Loading “Onload =” This.Classlist.Remove ('Image__Dam-img—Loading') “Oneror =” Imeloaderror (this) “Height =” 1080 “Width =” 1920 “/></picture> </div> </div></div> </p></div> </div> <div class=

First hearing in Harvard's fight against Trump Administration

03:34

The independence of lawyers for education praised Harvard by refusing the long list of the requirements of the Trump government, which also includes the change in the university guidelines for protests and approvals, the tightening of anti -Semitism efforts and the requirement of “point of view diversity” when setting anti -Semitism.

Harvard's financial freezing should stay on the spot at least until midsummer and until a federal district judge makes their final decision in the case. The school has not asked for emergency aid, and oral arguments are set for July 21.

The White House also threatened to lift Harvard's tax exemption status and its justification for foreign students.

Charleston's letter on Monday, which was announced by the name of the name of your office, was published together with an internal survey carried out last autumn, in which the climate for inclusion and belonging to the campus community is to be assessed.

“It seemed to be the right time to adapt my title to better reflect on what the offices under my leadership do for our campus community,” wrote Charleston.

The new pulse survey – with more than 10,000 respondents from the students, faculties and employees of Harvard – showed that only about half of the Jewish students who had answered information to feel comfortable if they expressed their opinion to others in Harvard. Among Muslim students who have taken over the survey, 51% stated that they had felt their opinion.

The Trump government has repeatedly cited anti -Semitism on campus as the main reason for new demands from Harvard. While the anti-defamation League and the Hillel chapter from Harvard have expressed the focus of the government on anti-Semitism, they have to damage financing cuts with the potential to harm Jewish students.

In Charleston's letter, a reference from Garber's statement on April 14 was also given the need to meet the affirmation of the Supreme Court of 2023, which ends affirmative measures in American universities. A case in the center of this judgment was Harvard and was decided by the same judge, who now led the financing dispute.

“We will continue to comply with the students for Fair Admissions against Harvard, who decided that title VI of the Civil Rights Act makes it illegal for the universities to make decisions on the basis of the breed,” Garber wrote this month.

Charleston, who was the first Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer by Harvard in 2020, did not immediately answer the questions from CNN about the announcement of the DEI office. The Harvard website still described the office with its old name on Tuesday morning and Charleston, who said that her new title was Chief Community and Campus Life Officer, through her previous title.

Harvard's decision to rename his DEI office follows similar restructuring in government agencies, schools and companies across the country in the middle of Trump's action against such programs. In an implementation regulation in January, President Dei condemned practices as “dangerous, humiliating and immoral racial and gender-based preferences”.

In his complaint, Harvard argues that the “attempt to force Harvard” of the Trump administration argues, at the same time ignores “fundamental principles for the initial adaptation” and claims that Washington has violated the legislative management for the administrative guidelines.

In particular, the Administrative Procedure Act “requires this court to keep illegal and to stop any final action lawsuit that” is arbitrary, moody, a misuse or in other ways “, according to the law,” says the Harvard lawsuit.

The lawyers of the Trump administration did not respond to the allegations in the lawsuit, but the press spokesman for the White House, Karoline Leavitt, said on April 22: “The president made it clear that Harvard has been able to lose their own means to lose their own means, and we expect all universities and universities that obey the federal law according to the federal law.”

CNNS Ray Sanchez, Kara Scannell, Nicki Brown, Taylor Romine and Lauren Mascarenhas contributed to this report.

Leave a Comment