Blake Lively's selfish

Blake Lively Lively laid only a few hours after it became known that BFF Taylor Swift was officially presented and was officially invited to the actress's ongoing lawsuit.

The 37-year-old Gossip Girl Alum-Der recently lost another A-List buddy, which is near Swift, informed her Instagram stories a clip when a hairdresser tested $ 19 Glam mousse from the brand.

The star launched the company last year when their film ends with us in cinemas, and consumers can buy articles in target shops or online.

LiveLy decided not to address the summon of the Grammy winner and instead to re -publish the advertising, which had been uploaded to the main account of the brand.

“I am obsessed with this video,” Blake typed when the hairdresser used the mousse on a model.

But also on Friday, Swift released a blasty reaction when she was charged as a witness in the middle of the public legal war between Lively and Justin. She had sent a legal announcement from Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman as a witness.

Taylor's warehouse beats the summons when they argue that she was not very involved in the drama on the 2024 film set, which it ends with us.

A representative of Taylor gave Dailymail.com a blasty reaction with the inscription: “Taylor Swift never set the set of this film, she was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not achieve the film …

“She has never seen a processing or made notes to the film, she saw that he did not even end with us until weeks after his publication and traveled the biggest tour in history about the globe in 2023 and 2024.”

The representative notes that the only participation that Taylor had in the film was one of her tracks entitled My Tears Ricochet, which was from her album 2020 from 2020.

The explanation came to the conclusion: “In view of the fact that your participation licenses a song for the film that also did 19 other artists, this document pre -load is designed in such a way that it uses the name of Taylor Swift to awaken the public interest by creating boulevard -clickbait instead of concentrating on the facts of the case.”

This happened a day after Blake's lawyer Mike Gottlieb opened who will be the point of view in the upcoming examination of his customer with Baldoni.

On Thursday, the actress's lawyer confirmed that his client was ready to speak in court in court.

In response to whether LIVELY will testify, Gottlieb confirmed that, as expected, she would be witness in her process.

“The ultimate moment for the history of a plaintiff is in court. We expect this to be the case here [with Lively]he said to the people. “Of course she will testify.”

In the middle of speculation that some of the closest friends of Lively, such as Taylor Swift and Hugh Jackman, can be charged, said Gottlieb, “It is completely unclear what demands or defense are relevant in the case of one of these celebrities.

'This is a case of what happened to Blake Lively when she raised claims for sexual harassment on the set. It is not a case of how songs were selected for the film. It is not a fictional Marvel characters in Deadpool films, ”he said.

Gottlieb continued: “You have to ask the question, why are these people in charge? Do you have an actual relevance for the present case?

“They cannot simply be charged because they are famous and they think it will create a number of headlines. And the federal courts do not tolerate this kind of behavior. '

At this point, he explained that it was uncertain whether LIVELY's husband, Ryan Reynolds, would testify, since he is currently called a defendant in Baldoni's vendil.

The LIVELY team is working on receiving these claims.

Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman put back on God's statements and accused him of trying to distract himself from the case.

“Although it is obviously uncomfortable for the lively parties, the truth is not a distraction,” Freedman said in a statement towards people. 'The truth was clearly shown by unprocessed receipts, documents and film material. More come. '

Freedman continued: “Blake was the one who brought her top -class friends into this situation without taking care of her own personal or public counter reaction. As the truth shows, she used her dragons to manipulate Justin at every turn. '

Freedman's last remark was an allusion to Lively's alleged text messages to Baldoni, in which she referred to Swift and Reynolds 'Dragons'.

In the alleged texts, she compared herself to Khaleesi from Game of Thrones and explained “her” dragons “for better or worse”, for which she is fighting.

With regard to Reynold's' suspected misconduct: “Ryan's participation is very well documented and we still find intentional misconduct. Was Disney in Ryan actually complicit to use the shareholders to promote a personal resentment?

“I would be surprised to find out that this type of corporate waste would not lead too much to those who are concerned with the income of the shareholders.”

In December, LIVELY submitted an 80-page complaint for civil rights to the California Civil Rights Department before officially submitting a federal action a few weeks later.

In the same month, Lively Baldoni sued in the middle of claims for sexual harassment during the production of the film.

In her complaint, the Gossip Girl Alumna Baldoni accused of sexually harassing her in a variety of ways – including bodies that sham them – and orchestrating a compression campaign to damage her reputation.

Baldoni and his representatives said in response to the lawsuit, which lively twisted the meaning of text messages and misled the public through their interactions while creating the film picture.

In her lawsuit, Lively appointed a number of Baldoni employees, including his Wayfarer Studios company, the CEO des Studios, and the PR staff Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.

“I hope that my legal steps will help to withdraw the curtain for these dark retaliation to harm people who talk about misconduct, and help to protect others who may be targeted,” Lively told the New York Times the day after submitting the complaint.

Baldoni then sued the newspaper for a defamation claim in a story of December 21st, entitled “We can bury everyone”: in a Hollywood smear machine “. The newspaper denied the allegations.

On January 16, a lawsuit of 400 million US dollars against Lively, Reynolds and her publicist Leslie Sloane submitted a lawsuit in which she slandered and blackmail. Baldoni told the court that the trio had invented him “false accusations for sexual harassment”.

Since LIVELY's complaint was submitted, Baldoni has a number of professional consequences, including a lawsuit by a former publicist. And to drop from the agency WME, which also repeats alive and Reynolds.

WME has denied the claim that Lively and Reynolds leaned on to them from their customer list, according to Variety.

The lawyers of both parties corresponded to a plan to tighten both federal cases into a federal case submitted in the future.

This week it was also known that the Wayfarer Foundation will be closed by Baldoni – but a reason was not announced.