Defender Appeal to Ki

Chandler, Az – this week Chandler Road Rage made victims of Chris Pelkey ​​Pelkey ​​International headlines when an artificial intelligence version of him appeared as the last declaration of sacrifice in the rifle conviction.

The judge in this case gave the accused Gabriel Horcasitas for 10.5 years. Immediately after the conviction, defender Jason Lamm appealed against the decision.

“While the victims have the right to speak to the court, to congest Chris Pelkey ​​through AI and frankly put words in his mouth because nobody would know what he would actually say, it just felt wrong on many levels,” said Lamm.

He added that the appeal courts in the coming months have an apparently unprecedented decision as to whether the AI ​​video was added to the punishment for Horcasitas.

The Pelkey ​​family's lawyer, Jessica Gattuso, announced ABC15 by phone that she believes that the conviction is confirmed because the written law supports what you did in court.

Gary Marchant is ASU professor, who is part of the AI ​​committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona. When asked whether there could be a sale, said Marchant:

“If you find that it was not a harmless mistake and the result would not have changed, he would have received the punishment, something like that, you may be able to continue.

He says because the Supreme Court of the State ABC15 said before the prerequisite that the use of AI has “great potential”, but it can “maintain justice if they are used inappropriately”.

“Those who use it, including the dishes, are responsible for their correctness,” added Marchant.

Marchant echoes that this case has the potential to open the AI ​​locks.

“Although it was meant very well and honest in this case, it can easily pass too much dishonest and much more strategy, much more selfish, so I think we cannot [set] This precedent in court to allow the fake videos in court, ”said Marchant.