Taylor Swift Cardaged as a witness in Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni Suit

Taylor Swift was charged in the escalating legal dispute between the process It ends with us Director Justin Baldoni and actress Blake Lively.

Although Swift's name “My Tears Ricochet” was not involved in the film,

“Taylor Swift never set the set of this film on foot, she was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not evaluate the film, she never saw an editing or made notes about the film, she only saw him weeks after his public publication with us.

Baldoni's suit – against Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds – applied for kidnapping the film and polluted his reputation with false accusations, including sexual harassment. While Swift is not mentioned in a suit, it is assumed that it is the “Megacelebrity friend”, which has supposedly rewritten in texts in which a scene is involved on the roof scene. According to the submission, Lively Baldoni invited to her NYC Penthouse, where Reynolds and quickly supported their changes.

Baldoni later wrote: “Today I also worked on the roof scene, I really love what you did. It really does [help] a lot. Makes it so much funnier and more interesting. (And I would have felt like that without Ryan and Taylor.) You are really a talent across the board. Really excited [and] grateful to do this together. “

LIVELY answered with a message that describes Reynolds and a reduced name as “absolute titan as a writer and storyteller”, and then added: “My dragons also protect those for whom I fight.

Swift's team dismissed the summons as an advertising work. “In view of the fact that their participation was to licensing a song for the film that 19 other artists also did, this document load is designed in such a way that it uses the name of Taylor Swift to arouse the public interest by creating boulevard -clickbait instead of concentrating on the facts of the fall.”

Despite it, It ends with us The actress Isabela Ferrer said that after his line -up she learned that Swift was a “helpful part of the prelude”.

The Legal Saga began in December, when Lively submitted a annoyance in the California civil rights department. After the New York Times reported about it, Baldoni sued the newspaper for 250 million US dollars. LIVELY then submitted a lawsuit against Baldoni for alleged legal violations, which increased his 400 million dollars. Lively and Reynolds submitted applications for dismissal and referred to the retaliation deployment.