Trump's opponents learn his patterns in the negotiations with high missions

President Trump has long been pleased with his reputation as a Maximalist, published a great demand, created a crisis and triggered a high -pressure negotiation.

But increasingly often he returns and simply explains a victory. His opponents seem to catch themselves and to sharpen their tactics on the basis of Mr. Trump's pattern and his unapiked transactional attitude towards diplomacy.

The dynamics have repeatedly played in the past few weeks when Mr. Trump returned to different degrees, in his plans to transform Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East”, transform Canada into the 51st state and defeated China with tariffs.

Now two very different tests appear. One is over where Mr. Trump is with the largest allies of America or President Vladimir V. Putin from Russia to preserve the sovereignty and security of Ukraine in an armistice. The other with Iran can determine whether he is really ready to stand aside and bomb Iran Israel – or to take part in despite the risks – if he could not do a better nuclear agreement than what President Barack Obama got and can cut the Iranian way to a bomb.

Both negotiations lack the numerical symmetries of customs negotiations. Thousands, if not millions of life, may be at stake. Both contain decades of complaints that arise on the Iranian revolution and the separation of the Soviet Union.

And Russia and Iran seem to improve their strategies after watching Mr. Trump in action. Cancellations from these countries point to Mr. Trump's negotiator, Steve Witkoff, point out that there can be some investment opportunities for Americans if the United States relax their demands. Like Mr. Trump, Mr. Witkoff has a story in real estate.