Taylor Swift pre -load fight in the middle of Justin Baldoni Blake Lively Battle

Taylor SwiftThe legal team tries to reject Justin Baldoni'S summary in the middle of his ongoing legal dispute with Blake lively.

According to legal documents that were preserved by Advertising board On Tuesday, May 13th, the legal application submitted on Monday, May 12th, It ends with us Legal drama according to details in Venables application.)

The submission of Venable, which suggested that Baldoni, 41, Swift, a close friend of LIVELY, had charged of his legal case: “Venable had nothing to do with the film in which the film satisfied, or one of the demands or defendings that are not able to prevent the underlying lawsuit.

Venable's application is made after a representative of Swift Baldoni's lawyers beaten up in a declaration to the lawyers US Weekly On Friday, May 9th. “Taylor Swift never set the set of this film, it was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not evaluate the film, she never saw an editing or made notes about the film,” says the explanation. “She didn't even see It ends with us At weeks after his public publication and traveled the biggest tour in history in 2023 and 2024. “

Baldoni – who led Lively in 2024 and played the leading role It ends with us – And Lively's legal dispute went to the stock exchange in December 2024 when Lively submitted a lawsuit for sexual harassment against him. Baldoni submitted a 400 million dollar counteruit, which also aimed at Lively's husband. Ryan ReynoldsAnd your publicist Leslie Sloane. Baldoni and their legal teams have vehemently denied the accusations of the other.

In the Venables application, further details of Baldoni's summons were also revealed, including his request for all communication between Swift and Lively as well as Swift and Reynolds (48) and the legal team of the couple per year Advertising board. Venable claimed that Baldoni had the communication of LIVELY and REYNOLDS directly.

Swift's participation It ends with us was outlined in the statement of her lawyer Us On May 9th. “The connection that Taylor had to this film allowed the use of a song 'My Tears Ricochet'. In view of the fact that their participation was to licensed a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document load is designed in such a way that it uses the name of Taylor Swift to wake up the public interest by creating boulevard clickbait,, Instead of concentrating on the facts of the case.

Last week a lawyer for lively, Mike Gettleibcriticized the idea that Swift and Reynolds were charged during an interview by Baldoni People. “This is a case of what happened to Blake Lively when she raised claims for sexual harassment on the set,” he said in an article published by The Outlet on May 8. (In January, Baldoni also accused Reynolds of supporting the base Deadpool & Wolverine The character “Nicepool” on him and calls on the Disney and Marvel studios to “keep all existing documents and data relevant” and “mock all documents with regard to the deliberate attempt”.

Gotleib continued: “You have to ask the question … Why are these people in charge? Do you have an actual relevance for the present case? You cannot simply carry out the lectures because they are famous and you think that it will create a number of headlines. And the federal dishes do not tolerate this behavior.”

Related: Blake Lively's lawyers are looking for Justin Baldoni's financial documents

Blake Lively's lawyers are reportedly looking for access to the financial documents of Justin Baldoni in the recent chapter of their lengthy legal struggle. TMZ reports that the LIVELY BALDONI and his company Wayfarer Studios asks to prove that they have lost the 400 million US dollars that they end in their defamation against IT […]

Baldonis lawyer Bryan Freedman replied to Gottlieb's comments in a subsequent explanation. “Although obviously uncomfortable for the lively parties, the truth is not a distraction,” Freedman wrote. “The truth was clearly shown by unprocessed receipts, documents and a real life. To come more.

In a March edition of UsOne source only announced that Swift was “not satisfied to be brought to the legal chaos”. Us Also on Monday reveals that LIVELY and SWIFT's relationship is now “tense” and the friendship proves that “not what it used to be” when Swift keeps her distance from the actress.