Justin Baldoni's lawyer claims that Blake Lively had tried to blackmail Taylor Swift for public support

A judge in Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively's legal case throw out a letter that makes inflammatory statements about Blake.

The letter written by Justin's lawyer Bryan Freedman claims that Blake had threatened to blackmail her friend Taylor Swift by revealing personal texts if the singer has not taken her site in this case.

According to People Magazine, Freedman now doubles his claims and gives the judge more details. Freedman has signed an affidavit under the punishment of mone and claims that a reliable, unnamed source that Taylor is close to told him that Lively Swift's legal team contacted legal team.

Freedman claimed that the lawyers “called for Taylor Swift to make an explanation for social media this year in Ms. Lively's name that Taylor Swift made an explanation in the Super Bowl this year, and if Ms. Swift did not do this, Ms. Lively '10 years of private texts with Ms. Swift would publish.”

He claims that the unnamed source had told him that Lively Swift had asked to extinguish her earlier texts about four or five months earlier.

In the past on Thursday, the news broke that judge Lewis J. Liman answered the letter from the team's request to publish the letter, and said: “The letter is inappropriate and must be canceled. It is irrelevant for a problem before this court and does not require any measures from this court.”

His answer later insisted: “The only purpose of the letter is to promote the public scandal by raising inflammatory accusations, information and faith against Lively and her lawyer. The lawyer is pointed out that future misuse of the court's rate can be met with sanctions.”

Blake's spokesman told “Extra” in an explanation: “The Court of Justice took less than 24 hours to enforce Mr. Freedman's irrelevant, improper and inflammatory accusations, to strike them, to remove them from the court and to warn Mr. Freedman that further misconduct can be met with sanctions.”

Last week, Freedman Swift Swift was in charge as Star Witness in Justin and Blake's constant case “It Ends with Us”, while Taylor's representative fell back into an explanation of “Extra” and said: “This document load should use the name of Taylor Swift to wake up the public interest instead of concentrating instead of concentrating to concentrate on the facts of the case. “

Afterwards, Freedman wrote the letter to Richter Liman, who, with a request from the law firm, who had spoken to Venable, to stop this summons.

He explained: “The Wayfarer parties expect Venable to be considered to be lifted in a short time, since their lawyer and venable give in good faith. However, the lively defendants insist that the summons are incorrect information.

The letter continues: “In particular, the lawyer of the Wayfarer parties is informed and of the view of information from a source that is very likely reliable information that (i) Ms. Lively applied for Taylor Swift to delete her text messages; (II) Michael Gottlieb by Willkie Farr, Counsel for the alive -defender, where -Sws -sws -sws task that a veinable -attorne and a veneable attack for the Ms. -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Swift -Wift -swift, for Mrs. Swift, private texts in Ms. LIVELY's possession are released.

Lively Lively, Mike Gottlieb, said to “Extra”: “This is categorically wrong. We clearly deny all of these so -called allegations that are related to supposed anonymous sources, and it is what we expect from reality.

When Taylor's representative represented the summons last week, she said in full: “Taylor Swift never participated in the set of Casting or creative decisions. She did not achieve the film.