The Supreme Court deals with Donald Trump with a new blow to immigration

On Friday, the Supreme Court contested the Trump government's application to quickly resume the deportations of the Venezuelan nationals under the law on Alien Enemies Act, a law on the trigger of the enemy.

In a 7-2 decision, the judges rejected the emergency complaints submitted by lawyers who wanted to remove Venezuelan men, the gang affiliations are accused of a claim that qualified the administration for an accelerated deportation according to the rarely used statute of 1798.

President Donald Trump quickly aimed at deciding on the social truth. “The Supreme Court does not allow us to get criminals from our country!” He posted on Friday afternoon.

Newsweek turned to the US Ministry of Justice using the contact form and the American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the original lawsuit by e -mail to the comment.

Why is it important

President Donald Trump referred to the Anien Enemies Act (AEA) in March, on the basis that the United States will be under the invasion of extraterrestrial immigration due to immigration. The arrangement was aimed at alleged members of the Venezuelan gang tren de Aragua and enabled quick conversions without court hearings.

What to know?

The court had previously had high-proof cecot prison in a Cecot prison at night last month and temporarily blocked distances from a detention center in North Texas.

The decision on Friday, in which conservative judges Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito contradicted the majority, also with those who were held in Texas. Conservative judges John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch joined the liberal judges in the unsigned order.

In their decision, the judges sent the case back to an appellate court to decide on the underlying question of the use of the law on alien enemies, while the federal government that the plaintiffs were made available to start legal challenges for their immediately impending deportations.

“Under these circumstances, which observe about 24 hours before the distance, there are no information on how the proper procedural rights can exercise in order to contest the rights that the distance certainly does not pass,” said the non -signed judgment.

At least three federal judges said that Trump had wrongly used the AEA to accelerate the deportations of the people who say the administration are members of the Venezuelan gangs.

On Tuesday, a judge in Pennsylvania signed the use of the law.

The court approach for the deportations as part of the AEA flows from another Supreme Court, which had removed a case from a judge in Washington, DC, and decided that prisoners who wanted to question their deportations have to do where they are kept.

In April, the judges said that people have to receive “reasonable time” to submit a challenge. The court rejected the 12 hours that the administration said would be sufficient, but otherwise it would not be explained how long it meant.

Other dishes have tried to enforce longer time frames for immigrants to submit challenges, with at least two judges request 21 days and not the current 12-24 hours.

The US district judge Stephanie Haines ordered immigration officers to give people 21 days in their opinion, in which she otherwise said that deportations could take place as part of the AEA.

The Supreme Court also made it clear on Friday that the government did not block other opportunities, as the government could deport people.

In the past, Trump published the social truth on Friday and criticized the court after being oral arguments about his attempt to change citizenship. The judges seemed skeptical of the idea of ​​restricting the scope of the 14th change and at the same time limiting the limitation of the population of the lower court.

What people say

The judges of the Supreme Court in a non -signed statement: “We recognize the importance of the national security interests of the government and the need that such interests are pursued in a way that corresponds to the constitution.”

President Donald Trump, about truthful social, formerly on Friday: “The Supreme Court is played by the radical losers who have no support, the public hates them, and their only hope is the intimidation of the court that we cannot allow our country to happen!”

What happens next

The Trump administration continues with other legal challenges for the use of the Autien Enemies Act and the bypass of the proper procedure for immigrants who fight deportation.

This article contains the reporting by the Associated Press.

Update 16.05.25, 16:34 PM ET: This article has been updated with additional information.

Update 16.05.25, 5:26 pm ET: This article has been updated with additional information.

Update 16.05.25, 5:42 p.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional comments.