Xiaomi's XRing 01 competes with the Snapdragon 8 Elite in New Muthed Benchmark Leak. 10-core CPU cluster is only 7 percent slower in multi-core score, which is a real threat to the competition

This week Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun officially announced Xring 01, and it only took a few days for the in -house chipset to be discovered in a new leak to leak. The results show that the Snapdragon 8 elite is faster than the youngest participant, the difference is not much, which indicates that the 10 years who have devoted themselves to F&E have finally borne fruits for the Chinese company and represents an actual threat to Qualcomm and MediaTek. There are other details that we would like to check. So let us jump directly.

A combination of increased performance core and tactral flies enables the XING 01 to exchange strokes with the Snapdragon 8 elite, but the power consumption could be a problem

The Geekbench 6 list was uploaded by Tippster @jukanlossreve, but when we tried to look for the same benchmark, we were not so lucky. Regardless of this, the relevant device is the Xiaomi 25042PN24C and has the cluster of '2 + 4 + 2 + 2', whereby the fastest Cortex-X925 from ARMS is 3.90 GHz. Previously, a rumor claimed that the XING 01 would rely on designs by the British chip design company instead of in-house cores of the current generation. However, specific claims mentioned that the Cortex-X925 would be clocked at 3.20 GHz.

On this occasion, the frequency was reached to 3.90 GHz, which indicates that the XRing 01 is generated in the 3NM process of TSMC mass, not on the older 4 -NM node, since only this lithograph would make it possible for the SoC to maintain such cycle speeds and to run with acceptable temperatures. Next we have four cores, which work at 3.40 GHz, which we again suspect that they are the Cortex-X925. As for the remaining ones, they probably belong to Cortex-A725.

In order to support the XRing 01 in competition with people such as the Snapdragon 8 Elite and the dimensions 9400+ and to bring its single-core and multi-core values ​​to 2,709 and 8.125, Xiaomi may have intentionally increased the number of cores, which could impair its efficiency. For comparison, the Xiaomi 15 Pro received a single core and multi-core score of 2,919 or 8,699, which made the XRing 01 only 7 percent slower in the multi-thread category category. What confuses us, this entire benchmark leak shows a variation of the specifications of the chipset.

We reported that the configuration of the XRing 01 contains the cluster '1 + 3 + 4', while the Geekbench 6 list reveals something completely different. It may be possible that Xiaomi has a slower version of its custom silicone tailor for another device that rocks an 8-core CPU, but until we see tangible evidence, we recommend that the readers first treat this leak with a pinch of salt.