Here is the minimum net value to be viewed as a middle class in the 1960s

Curious whether your assets will bring you into the middle class these days? If you are in the 1960s – or nearby – it is a good time to check where you stand.

Find out more: Are you rich or bourgeois? 8 ways to go beyond your salary check

Find out: 7 tax gaps, which pays the rich use less and build more prosperity

After all, this is the decade in which many people observe retirement more serious, finally reduce this dream trip or finally book.

But how much net assets do you actually need to be seen as a “middle class” in this phase? Here is what the numbers say – and what they mean for their financial picture.

Andrew Lickewauth, attempts at money and owners of pregnant infinance, said in his experience with pensioners that they need at least 750,000 to 1 million US dollars to be solid in the 1960s.

And he said that it was quite conservative – especially in view of the inflation of the healthcare system and the apartment lately. According to an estimate of the health costs for Fidelity Retire Retire Retiree, the average couple in retirement at the age of 65 can spend around 315,000 US dollars for retirement health costs.

Many people who reached their 60s with around 800,000 US dollars feel quite comfortable, but not exactly wealthy. You can cover your basic expenses and have a scope for trips or hobbies, but you definitely don't live luxuriously.

Usually there is enough for occasional waste, such as a trip to visit the grandchildren or a nice dinner, but not so much that they can custody without budgeting.

The Sweet Spot seems to pay your house as a rule $ 300,000 to $ 400,000 in net assets-plus another $ 500,000 or more pension accounts and other assets.

This combination gives you a feeling of stability – knows that you have a roof over your head and a decent piece for health care, rising costs and a little fun. It is not a private money, but it is enough for a bourgeois lifestyle with a little breath.

Read on: Here is the minimum net value to be viewed as an upper class in the 50s

Lokenauth works with people in places like San Francisco, where even $ 2 million hardly feel. But then he has customers in smaller cities in the middle west that live quite well in half – so these numbers really have to be adapted to their apartment.

Kevin Shahnazari, founder and CEO of Finlywealth, agreed that the place was everything. For people who live in inexpensive areas such as San Francisco or New York, it may be difficult to reach this number, and they would have to need more assets to enjoy a similar quality of life.