Taylor Swift has the chance to buy back original recordings

It may not be such a “cruel summer” this year.

Taylor Swift will finally have the opportunity to buy back the original recordings of her first six albums, sources report page six after her original sale prompted one of the bitterest failures of her career.

In 2019, Swift had “Bad Blood” with music Impresario Scooter Braun after bought the master's shots of her first albums for $ 300 million and asked them to re-absorpate them all as “Taylors versions”.

At that time, Swift Braun – the Justin Bieber and once Kanye West, not Swift – led a “tyrant” and “the definition of the poisonous male privilege in our industry”.

Braun sold the recordings a year later to the Shamrock Capital investment company for a win, but the company is now interested in selling it back to Swift.

And we said that the person who encourages Shamrock is brown.

“Interestingly, it is scooter, who was the focus of the deal for the first time, one of the people who encourage this deal to take place,” said a source with the original SWIFT plate label.

The albums that negotiate back are: “Taylor Swift”, “Fearless”, “Speak Now”, “Red”, “1989” and “Reputation”.

Page six turned to a comment on representatives of Swift and Shamrock Capital.

The news comes a day after Swift debut the first reconstruction “Reputty (Taylor version)” on the TV show “The Handmaid's Tale” on the TV show “The Handmaid's Tale”.

Swift's mega hit “Look what you did, what you did (Taylor's version)” in a climatic moment in an episode of the program.

If Swift decides to buy back your master, the price in the baseball stadium of 600 to 1 billion US dollars would be -but according to Clayton Durant, founder of Music Consulting Firm CAD management.

He explained that she has both the old and the new recordings of her songs, she can make the lion's share of the publication of license fees of both. She will also have full control over her own catalog and can control whether you are licensed for commercials, film and television programs, with political rallies and much more.

“If you fall back and create a deal structure in which she could receive the rights to her original recordings, she exponentially increases the amount of money she deserves,” Durant told page six.

“She still earns money with the publisher out of that [original] Songs ”, but not as much as from the versions of the Taylor that she owns, he said.

He also noticed: “When she emphasizes a new recording version, the consumption also spikes the original.”

When Swift's champions were sold, she claimed that she had never given the chance to buy her, and the deal was not aware of an attitude that she has retained since then.

However, the website announced that the website was “discussed with music insiders for almost a year” and was widely known in the industry.

In the meantime, sources said to page six: “Her father, the shareholder, was [in Big Machine]16 million US dollars from the sale and must have known about it. This term is supported by e -mails that were sent at the time, as Scott Swift contributed to a “data space” for the company, which the Masters bought.

“The Shamrock team wants to make sure that Taylor has the knowledge that they are trying to complete this deal because they are not sure whether they have ever been offered for the first time,” said us.

This was reproduced in the Max documentary “Bad Blood”, which indicated that Swift had the chance in 2019 to buy her Master ligaments from Scott Borchetta, head of BMGL -and again from Braun when he sold them to the Equity company Shamrock in October 2020.

It was also in doubt in the existence of an NDA Swift that she was signed and found that her father Scott achieved a payday of 15.1 million US dollars due to the deal after his minority stake in BMLG was sold.

In 2005, when Swift was 15 years old, she joined her first record contract with Big Machine, who was co-founded by country star Toby Keith in Nashville, and registered for six studio albums.

When the sale took place in 2019, Swift expressed its annoyance about Braun and the CEO of Big Machine, Scott Borchetta.

“Scooter robbed me of the work of my life that I had no opportunity to buy,” Swift wrote at that time in the Tumblr post.

“Essentially, my musical heritage is in the hands of someone who tried to reduce it,” she said.

Swift's decision to republish its first six albums lit an industry -wide conversation about the possession of artists in their own work, the functioning of labels and the monetization of songs.

“She is so rich. She is already a billionaire. How much further she wants to go? Maybe it's a principle for her,” said Durant.