The Supreme Court initially has Trump removed agency drivers

The Supreme Court temporarily removed the leaders of two independent agencies on Thursday and presented a contestation of the legal principle, which limits the authority of a president to dismiss such officials.

The arrangement did not give a number of votes, which is typical of such emergency applications, but contained a two -sided summary of the argument of the court. Judge Elena Kagan issued a written dissent, which was summarized by the other two liberals of the court, the Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The majority wrote that Mr. Trump could remove officials who exercise power in his name “because the constitution transfers the president's executive power”. They wrote that this authority only “close exceptions that were recognized by our precedent”.

In her contradiction, Justice Kagan countered that the majority fell away on many years of precedent that “as she wrote,” both the shots of the president and the decision of the court to grant emergency aid “to conclude.

She described the president as “to” take the law into her own hands “and added that the majority” effectively bless these deeds “with their decision.

“Not since the 1950s (or before) a president has tried to remove an officer from a classic independent agency without a legitimate reason,” she wrote.