Taylor Swift: Taylor Swift wins around one: Justin Baldoni Drop's summon

Taylor Swift made headlines when she was dragged into the legal courtroom drama with Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni.

However, the storm cleaned up and the pop sensation that Taylor Swift won the legal dispute without ever having to appear in court.

Justin Baldoni withdrew Taylor Swift and her lawyers after the right team from Swift claimed that they were unjustified.
The summons that the communication between the legal teams of Swift and Blake Lively had been lifted by applications submitted by their respective lawyers.

What was the response from Taylor Swift's legal team?

Taylor Swift's lawyers beat the move as unfounded and an advertising work that is supposed to move them into controversy. They claimed that it was an “unjustified fishing expedition” according to a report by Variety.

Blake Lively's spokesman claimed on Thursday in a statement that Baldoni had tried to use Swift's fame as a distraction from the real problems of the case. “We will continue to defend third parties that are unjust or threatened in this process, and we support Taylor's teams efforts to suppress these inappropriate symptoms that are sent to their lawyer.”

Why did Justin Baldoni try to include Taylor Swift?

Taylor Swift was mentioned in Baldoni's lawsuit as “Megacelebrity friend” by LIVELY, which she supported during a creative dispute.

He claimed that Swift and Reynolds, who called Lively as her “dragon”, put pressure on him to meet Lively's script changes.

It does not seem as if certain claims have to do something with the lectures that were sent to Swift and their legal team on May 8 and April 28, according to a report by Variety.

Also read: Who was the uche ojeh, husband of 'Today' Show co-moderator Sheinelle Jones, who died at 45? How did he die?

The lawyer of Justin Baldoni, Bryan Freedman, submitted a dish in which he claimed that instead he was looking for proof that LIVELY's lawyer had threatened to make lively Swift texts public, unless Swift delivered Lively.

Freedman claimed that Swift's lawyer had documented the supposedly blackmail exchange in a letter to Lively's lawyer, which he tried about the summons.

Freedman's accusations were classified by Livively's lawyers as “clear and demonstrably wrong”, which claimed that the submission of the Court should only uncover the scandalous claims in a way that would protect it from defamation liability.

The lawyers of Swift and Lively claimed that the allegations had no influence on the defense and claims that were really considered in this case.

Faqs

Was Taylor Swift involved in the film or the court proceedings?
No, Swift did not play a creative or professional role in the film and never appeared on the set.

Why was Swift in charge?
Baldonis' lawyers claimed that someone near Swift had had information about alleged threats from LIVELY's Legal Team that SWIFTS TEAM came.