Jordan Peterson records 20 atheists in viral video

The famous Canadian psychologist and philosopher Jordan Peterson recently appeared in the latest episode of the series Surround On the YouTube channel anniversary. Anniversary has 10 million subscribers and his team exhibits professionally produced content in a regular schedule.

In their Surround Series, you have a top -class guest, discuss 20 people who alternately turn to the opposite view.

Previously, they had the conservative activist Charlie Kirk on the show, who accumulated 29 million views in eight months. The result with the conservative political commentator Ben Shapiro, who will be one of the speakers presented at CPAC Hungary in 2025 this week, has 15 million views on her channel.

Professor Peterson accepted 20 atheists in this piece, as the most prominent theistic philosopher of the 21st century. It was uploaded on Sunday, May 25th and already has 1.85 million goals on YouTube.

Peterson's first claim was: “Atheists reject God, but they do not understand what they reject”, what, as he explained, is something that he observed when talking to atheists. He later also explained that in this case he passed through the definition of the prophet Elijah in the Old Testament, which God defined God as a guiding voice of conscience.

The second claim that the guest had to defend against his opponent was: “Morality and purpose cannot be found in science.” The first participant against the application pointed out that there are indications that Neanderthals, who take care of their illness, and chimpanzees who want to have given them the same amount of their homecours. In response to this, Professor Peterson claimed that this only proves that morality is intrinsic and precedes human understanding of science. And morality is not something that can be derived from the scientific process.

Two more requirements had to argue about the show. First: “Everyone reveres something, even atheists, although he may not know:” Then the atheists accept Christian morality, but deny the basic stories of religion. “In the former question, both the professor and his first opponent agreed that all people have their own fundamental values ​​that work on their life based on their life, which Dr. Peterson looks at the God they worship. In the latter question, the first debate brought the violent actions that God had committed in the Old Testament And ultimately led free will.

At the moment when the most attention had attracted attention, Professor Peterson was not ready to admit one of his opponents of debate that he is a Christian and invited some ridicule from the young man. In response, Peterson asked to end the conversation with him, although the format normally enables the audience to select the debate with a majority.