The Trump administration asks the Supreme Court to increase the deportations to “third countries”.

Washington – The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Tuesday to make it easier for officials to deport convicted criminals to “third countries” that are not their nations of origin.

The administration tries to block an injunction that has created the US district judge Brian Murphy, based in Massachusetts, that the immigrants concerned should receive a “meaningful opportunity” nationwide to consider concerns that they may be threatened with torture, persecution or death.

Murphy later made it clear that they should have at least ten days to raise their claims.

Just last week, the judge said that the government violated his previous arrangement by flying eight migrants to South Sudan. The men are now captured in a US facility in Dschibuti.

All immigrants who may be affected by the legal disputes are already subject to deportation. The case therefore depends on the legal process you receive before you can be deported.

The Attorney General D. John Sauer wrote in the new submission that Murphy's decisions from the government demands that he had to carry out “a stressful series of procedures” that he had not authorized.

“These court-created procedures are currently confused to the distant process of the third country. In addition to the authority of the executive, the injunction is disrupted by the injunction policy sensitive diplomatic, foreign political and National Security efforts,” wrote Sauer.

Murphy's original April command came to the conclusion that the plaintiffs only asked for a fundamental proper procedure.

“The plaintiffs only ask that they are deported to a new country before they are brought to such a country and explain the opportunity to explain why such deportation will probably lead to their persecution, torture and/or death,” he wrote.

On Monday evening, Murphy rejected a government attempt to rethink his requirements because he refers to the men in South Sudan.

“It turns out that an immigration procedure on another continent is more difficult and logistical than the accused expected,” he wrote.

“It is still the sincere hope of this court that reason can make rhetoric better,” he added.