Federal judge meets Trump's use of Alien Enemies Act to deport the Venezuelans

On Thursday, a federal judge permanently triggered the Trump government from the justification of the law on the alien enemies, a law of the 18th century, to the Venezuelans from the 18th century, which it regarded as criminals from the southern district of Texas, and said that the use of the law of the White House was illegal.

The decision of the judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr. was the most extensive decision so far from one of the numerous lawyers who currently listen to the efforts of the White House to employ the powerful but rarely professional law as part of its far -reaching deportation plans.

The 36-page decision by Richter Rodriguez, a President Trump-Lenenenen, consisted of a philosophical rejection of the attempts by the White House to translate the extraterrestrial enemy law, which was threatened by war in 1798 as an emerging association with France, in the context of modern immigration policy.

The Supreme Court has already said that all Venezuelans who want to break out the White House as part of Mr. Trump's proclamation, who wants to call the law, to question their distance. Richter Rodriguez's decision continued and said that the White House should be used the importance of the law, which is only to be used against members of an enemy foreign nation in times of the declared war or during a military invasion.

While the decision of Richter Rodriguez only for Venezuelan immigrants in the southern district of Texas -which also includes cities such as Houston, Brownsville and Laredo -this could have the use of the Assiness Enemies Act by the administration of the Alien -Erfe Act.

“The Court comes to the conclusion that the executive cannot rely on the AEA based on the proclamation in order to capture the petents mentioned and the certified class or to remove them from the country,” wrote Richter Rodriguez.