close
close

Spokane, Tacoma ranged to “cheapest” cities for pensioners in the USA

play

According to a publication recently published by Gobanking Council, two cities in the state of Washington were kept “50 cheapest places to retire” in the state of Washington.

According to the study, Spokane in East Washington is the third city for pensioners in the USA. Tacoma in Western Washington is the 33rd. The most affordable city for retirement.

Gobanking Council found that the ranking was based on an analysis of the 100 largest cities in the United States, in which seniors made up at least 10% of the population. The study took into account in the annual retirement income, which are required to cover living costs such as living space, health care, food, transport and energy.

“Most people retire with a limited budget, which means looking for new places where they can further expand their money,” the report says.

Here are more in the ranking and why these locations in Washington are among the most affordable places in the USA to retire.

Is Spokane a good place to retire?

The monthly issues in Spokane were on average at 1,711 US dollars, and the population of people aged 65 and over was 16.4%.

The city was also assigned a “livelability evaluation” of 81, one of the highest in the study, some of which were based on data that hasavibe divided.

Areavibes offers Spokane high grades for his living costs, “shorter as average” commuters as well as access to health care and hospitals, nursing homes and doctors.

“The art and cultural scene in Spokane is dynamic and diverse, with numerous theaters, music event locations and art galleries,” said Areavibes. “The Fox Theater and the Northwest Museum of Arts and Culture are just a few of the cultural sights that show the city's commitment to the arts. Life in Spokane offers enough opportunities to deal with art, music and history and to call it an exciting place.”

The median price of a house in Spokane County, to which Spokane belongs, was $ 437,300 in the fourth quarter of 2024, as can be seen from a report by the Washington Center for Real Estate Research at the University of Washington.

Is Tacoma a good place to retire?

The study calculated the average monthly issues of Tacoma to USD 1,819. The population of people aged 65 and over is 14.6%.

With a Livability score of 78, Areavibes found that Tacomas near Seattle and Olympia contributes to his place as a “cultural and economic hub” in the region.

“Risled institutions such as the University of Washington Tacoma contribute to the academic and cultural liveliness of the city and promote a flourishing intellectual community,” said Area. “The art and cultural scene in Tacoma is dynamic and diverse, with numerous theaters, music sites and art galleries.”

Tacoma is Pierce County's county seat, where the median price of a house was 571,800 US dollars in the fourth quarter of 2024, according to the Washington Center for Real Estate Research Report.

What are the 50 cheapest places where you can withdraw through America?

  • No. 1: Akron, Ohio
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,699
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.7%
    • Livability score: 81
  • No. 2: Albuquerque, New Mexico
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,710
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 17.2%
    • Livability score: 72
  • No. 3: Spokane, Washington
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,711
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 16.4%
    • Livability score: 81
  • No. 4: Cleveland, Ohio
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,723
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15%
    • Livability score: 72
  • No. 5: Toledo, Ohio
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,738
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.5%
    • Livability score: 66
  • No. 6: Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,741
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.9%
    • Livability score: 84
  • No. 7: Greensboro, North Carolina
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,742
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.9%
    • Livability score: 83
  • No. 8: Amarillo, Texas
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,745
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.8%
    • Livability score: 66
  • No. 9: Grand Rapids, Michigan
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,745
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 12.9%
    • Livability score: 83
  • No. 10: Little Rock, Arkansas
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,745
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.2%
    • Livability score: 72
  • No. 11: Brownsville, Texas
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 12.6%
    • Livability score: 79
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,754
  • No. 12: Winston-Salem, North Carolina
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,765
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.8%
    • Livability score: 63
  • No. 13: Colorado Springs, Colorado
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,768
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.7%
    • Livability score: 79
  • No. 14: Salem, Oregon
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,775
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.3%
    • Livability score: 79
  • No. 15: Shreveport, Louisiana
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,776
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 17.4%
    • Livability score: 60
  • No. 16: Tucson, Arizona
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,776
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.8%
    • Livability score: 73
  • No. 18: Boise, Idaho
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,784
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.3%
    • Livability score: 83
  • No. 17: Des Moines, Iowa
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,783
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 12.5%
    • Livability score: 83
  • No. 19: Eugene, Oregon
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,794
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 17.7%
    • Livability score: 78
  • No. 20: Knoxville, Tennessee
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,794
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.5%
    • Livability score: 73
  • No. 21: El Paso, Texas
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,794
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.9%
    • Livability score: 81
  • No. 22: Fort Collins, Colorado
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,795
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 12.2%
    • Livability score: 81
  • No. 23: Springfield, Missouri
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,802
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.8%
    • Livability score: 72
  • No. 24: Cincinnati, Ohio
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,804
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.2%
    • Livability score: 80
  • No. 25: Chattanooga, Tennessee
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,807
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 17.2%
    • Livability score: 76
  • No. 26: Sioux Falls, South Dakota
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,809
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.7%
    • Livability score: 85
  • No. 27: Columbus, Ohio
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,809
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 11.0%
    • Livability score: 81
  • No. 28: Lexington, Kentucky
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,813
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.4%
    • Livability score: 87
  • No. 29: Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,815
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 12.9%
    • Livability score: 76
  • No. 30: St. Paul, Minnesota
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,815
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 12.2%
    • Livability score: 80
  • No. 31: Columbus, Georgia
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,818
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.4%
    • Livability score: 64
  • No. 32: St. Louis, Missouri
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,818
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.9%
    • Livability score: 74
  • No. 33: Tacoma, Washington
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,819
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.6%
    • Livability score: 78
  • No. 34: Minneapolis, Minnesota
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,823
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 10.8%
    • Livability score: 78
  • No. 35: Memphis, Tennessee
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,825
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.1%
    • Livability score: 70
  • No. 36. Augusta, Georgia
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,826
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 14.8%
    • Livability score: 64
  • No. 37: San Antonio, Texas
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,826
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.1%
    • Livability score: 80
  • No. 38: Corpus Christi, Texas
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,833
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.0%
    • Livability score: 80
  • No. 39: Aurora, Illinois
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,834
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 10.5%
    • Livability score: 71
  • No. 40: Cary, North Carolina
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,834
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.9%
    • Livability score: 90
  • No. 41: Raleigh, North Carolina
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,837
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 11.7%
    • Livability score: 84
  • No. 42: Durham, North Carolina
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,837
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.0%
    • Livability score: 82
  • No. 43: Louisville, Kentucky
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,839
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.9%
    • Livability score: 66
  • No. 44: Reno, Nevada
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,852
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 16.3%
    • Livability score: 81
  • No. 45. Madison, Wisconsin
    • Monthly expenses: $ 1,853
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 12.7%
    • Livability score: 82
  • No. 46: Tulsa, Oklahoma
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,854
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 15.0%
    • Livability score: 75
  • No. 47: Kansas City, Kansas
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,856
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.0%
    • Livability score: 75
  • No. 48: Lubbock, Texas
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,856
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 12.5%
    • Livability score: 78
  • No. 49: Macon, Georgia
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,857
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 16.2%
    • Livability score: 75
  • No. 50: Richmond, Virginia
    • Monthly expenses: USD 1,858
    • Percent of the population aged 65 and over: 13.6%
    • Livability score: 84

Contribution: Carly Sauvageau and Ginnie Sandoval, USA Today Network.

Leave a Comment