Trump's command against the Percer Coie law firm is unconstitutional, judicial rules

On Friday, a federal judge decided that a signed President Trump, who had signed the law firm in March, was unconstitutional, and instructed the government not to enforce its conditions, which had threatened to improve the business of the law firm.

The verdict was the first time that a court had occurred to permanently prevent Mr. Trump from punishing a law firm against which he opposed politically.

Judge Beryl A. Howell from the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia wrote that attempts to practice the right to practice the right to practice the right to practice the right to practice the ability of its lawyers to practice the right.

“No American president ever have executive orders like those who were in question,” she wrote, adding: “In the purpose and effect, this action draws from a game book that is as old as Shakespeare that wrote the sentence:” The first thing we do, we kill all lawyers “.

The lawsuit was the first of four similar cases to achieve a solution. Lawyers who represented the law firm had argued that the type of order of the president was so obviously forced that the minimum time was necessary to assess his illegality.

They argued, and judge Howell agreed that the arrangement had clearly violated the first and fifth changes, which means that Perkin's Coie and other similarly situated companies “think and speak” freedom and equally protection according to the law.