Judge trumps Trump Executive Order on the Law Chancellery Perkins Coie: NPR

On Friday, a federal judge depressed President Trump's executive order against the prominent law firm Perkin's Coie, she found that she was unconstitutional and declared an attack on the fundamental principles of the American legal system.

The decision of the US district judge Beryll Howell is the first to permanently block an executive regulation issued by Trump, which punishes a law firm for the representation of clients or causes he does not like.

“No American president has never issued executive orders before, as in this lawsuit that aims at a prominent law firm, with disadvantageous measures that can be carried out by all executive agencies,” wrote Howell in their 102-page decision.

“But in the purpose and effect, this action is emerging from a game book that is as old as Shakespeare who wrote the sentence: 'The first thing we do let us kill all lawyers.'”

Perkin's Coie was the first law firm to take on a comprehensive execution regulations that took potentially existential punishment. Trump's command suspended security checks for the company's employees, banned his lawyers from access to state buildings and civil servants and ended government contracts with the company.

Trump has issued similar executive regulations against several other prominent law firms, which he regarded as a political enemy. In addition to Perkins Coie, three of these companies have questioned Trump's actions and received judicial orders that temporarily blocked the enforcement of the orders.

Perkin's Coies case is the first to be blocked permanently.

In her judgment, Richter Howell freed the goal of Perkins as an attack on the independence of the legal profession and the judicial system.

“The importance of independent lawyers for the guarantee of the fair and impartial judicial administration of the American judicial system has been recognized in this country since its foundation,” she said in her decision.

In this case, she added “presented an unprecedented attack on these basic principles.”

Trump's command, the judge wrote, “stigmatized and punished a certain law firm and its employees”, from partners via Mailroom companion because the representation of customers through the law firm, which exert claims and take positions that Trump does not like.

“In a terrifying turn on the theater phrase, we kill killed all The lawyers, '”,” she adds, Trump's executive regulations “pursues the approach of' let killing the lawyers I don't like'Send the clear message: lawyers have to stick to the party line, or otherwise. “

Perkin's Coie welcomed her decision.

“This judgment confirms the core -friendly freedoms that are close to the heart of all Americans, including freedom of speech, proper procedure and the right to choose a lawyer without the fear of retaliation,” said a spokesman in a statement. “We are happy about this decision and are incredibly grateful to those who have an impact on our positions. While we are further developing, we remain guided by the same obligations that forced us first to provide this challenge: to protect our law firm, to protect the interests of our clients and maintain the rule of law.”

The Ministry of Justice did not immediately answer a request for a comment.

While Perkins and three other companies have questioned Trump's commands, at least nine other companies have either completed the business with the president to get him to raise an arrangement against them or to avoid the possibility of one. In return, they have agreed to deliver hundreds of millions of dollars in the free legal work that support them and the presidents.