Why “Royal Family” trends after the legal dispute after Prince Harry's interview

Whether you like it or not – a Royal family feud Never goes out of trend!
In the past few days, the same old truth has carried a will. As it (in) famous, the relationship between the Royals and the media has always been a two-way street. The princess Diana of the late people, who was certainly a goal of media examination and exploitation, also used the media to use their own advantage, especially after their divorce. She recognized the power of the media and tried to control her narrative, sometimes to her own advantage. The discussion about the responsibility of the media in their history – in life and beyond – was now part of her heritage.

Prince Harry, who is pretty exuberant, seems to be in the same way.
Although the “replacement” Prince of the Royal Family lost the legal battles a few days ago, he did not withdraw without making some remarkable waves after the defeat.

What happened?

Prince Harry recently lost a legal challenge about the security level, which he and his family in Great Britain are entitled to. The Duke of Sussex had tried to lift a decision that had downgraded his security after moving to the USA with the Duchess of Sussex.
After the legal loss, the second son of the British royal family appeared for an interview with the BBC after he had lost his latest legal challenge against the government because of his security – a decision that he says that he has susceptible to threats in his life.

From prospects that he had returned to Great Britain with his children, right up to his relationship with his family and a sick father, King Charles-Duke of Sussex, as it seemed, exposed his heart in this explosive “Tell-All” Interview.

The keynotes:

Prince Harry resigned with his wife Meghan Markle in January 2020 as Senior Royals (Re: 'Megxit') and moved to Montecito, California. His relationship with the royal family has been tense since then, and in the interview he confirmed that King Charles did not speak to him because of the court battle.
However, Harry also had an emotional plea, where he thinks about the idea of ​​”reconciliation” and said: “I don't know how long my father will no longer have – he won't talk to me because of these safety material, but it would be nice to get involved.” He added: “There is no point in struggle, life is precious.”

Harry mentioned in the same breath: “Some members of my family will never be forgiven” that he wrote his memoir replacement, and said: “It would be nice to have this reconciliation section now. If you don't want that, that's completely up to you.” Throne.
Prince Harry also pointed out how the “lack of security” had an effect on him and said: “I can't see a world in which I would bring my wife and children back to Great Britain” and added a solemn lawsuit, “I love my country, I always did it.

What did the palace say?

Prince Harry didn't hold back much in his latest BBC interview and claimed that some people “want history to be repeated”. He even confirmed that the protection of the license and public figure committee known as Ravec downgraded his security in 2020 without proper procedure under the influence of members of the royal budget overnight. Although he refused to name names, he added: “I know all the names of the people who were involved in this process.”

According to Harry's shocking claims in front of the camera, Buckingham Palace gave an explanation about a spokesman in a surprising step: “All of these problems were repeated and meticulously examined by the courts, with the same conclusion being drawn on every occasion.”
But Prince Harry didn't stop here. Citing national security, he also asked Prime Minister Sir Keir Starrer and Interior Minister Yvette Cooper to examine the Ravec and possibly make changes to the functionality of the committee. Although he did not call for any specific measures, Prince Harry suggested to examine why the royal budget has representatives of the committee right from the start.

The 'resounding' consequences:

As soon as all this chatter came with the loudest reaction from the expected place – from Meghan Markle.
Just one day after the legal loss of re -hiring her security, the Duchess of Sussex published a photo with her son Prince Archie (5) and her daughter Princess Lilibet, 3, apparently an explanation of solidarity.
Prince Harry showed his back to the camera when he went hand in hand with Archie, while Lilibet was apparently sitting in Montecito at the family at his shoulders.
Although the second son of the royal family has not held back when he spent a subtle warning and said: “If something should happen to me, my wife or grandchildren of my father. If something should happen to you, see where the responsibility lies that the responsibility has not commented on any events. However, your contribution spoke volumes and fits into the current internet bongs.