Harry and Meghan in the royal violation as “money for access” scandal are relationships with King Charles to a new low

Prince Harry's broken relationship with his family could be deteriorated by an apparently violations of the Agreement with the British Royals when he resigned from his official duties.

Since the Duke of Sussex (40) and the Ms. Meghan Markle (43), who left the UK to America in 2020, the tensions between Harry and the rest of his family have increased.

Before the move it was said that the family achieved an agreement as Sandringham Agreement, which contained a number of requirements for Harry and Meghan to follow.

Among the guidelines for the couple was that they would keep their royal sovereignty but would not be used and that they would no longer be seen as working royals.

However, one of these rules seems to be broken because the website for a new initiative in which Prince Harry is involved apparently described as royal … which is a big no-no one within the framework of the Sandringham Agreement.

Prince Harry appeared in Las Vegas on Tuesday to announce his support for the Diana Awards's new investment initiative.

While the Diana Award asked for donations on his website, she offered a selection of rewards for companies that decide to make a contribution – one of them included a ticket for what she called “Royal Gala”.

However, in order to snap an invitation to the “Royal Gala”, the participants would have to assume over hundreds of thousands of dollars, since they agree to companies that will be willing to donate 260,000 US dollars plus one year in an obvious “cash for access” expression.

Dailymail.com asked for a comment.

There are no further details about who could belong among the hosts of the “Royal Gala”, but a photo of Prince Harry was strategically placed directly above the blurb.

The initiative of the Diana Award is described as a “exclusive opportunity for future -oriented companies such as their, a strategic, measurable and high investment in the future of youth leadership”.

Prince Harry sat down to discuss the initiative with the managing director of Diana Award and two of the owners of the award on Tuesday.

“In cooperation with the Diana Award, he helps to combine company investments and youth development and stand up for a vision in which innovation, equity and service combine – not only to meet the challenges of today's workforce, but also to compensate for the full potential of the next generation of managers,” says a press release.

“He continues his mother's legacy, Princess Diana, whose unshakable belief in the power of young people is the focus of this mission.”

The appearance came days after Harry had participated in a Bombbbbc television interview on his hopes for “reconciliation” with his family.

After Harry had lost the last round in his court battle for his security, he said: “This is the focus of a family dispute.”

When asked whether Charles had been addressed to use his influence on Harry's legal problems, the Duke seemed to imply that the king was an obstacle. A comment that probably deepens the crack with his father and brother Prince William.

He said, “I never asked him to intervene, I asked him to avoid and do the experts their work.”

The health of the king, who is treated against cancer, was emphasized by his son, who said: “And I said life is precious.

“I don't know how long my father, he, he, he won't talk to me about these safety material, but it would be nice to reconcile.”

Harry, who looked emotionally and close to tears through a large part of the interview, offered an olive branch and said he could forgive my family and Charles, the prince of Wales and his stepmother, the queen, since he had dated his wife Meghan in 2016.

He also said that information he learned during the legal process caused him to discover that some people repeat the story in an obvious reference to Diana's death.

The Duke lost a challenge from the Court of Appeal to his security agreements in Great Britain and said on television that he could not see a world in which I would bring my wife and children back to Great Britain.

In his appeal against the dismissal of his high court against the Ministry of the Interior against the decision of the Executive Committee to protect license fees and public personalities (Ravec), he failed that he was supposed to receive a different degree of protection in Great Britain.