Federal judge accuses Trump arguments in the Venezuelan migrant case

On Wednesday evening, a federal judge expressed skepticism to the reasons of the Trump government to avoid the return of numerous Venezuelan immigrants who had been shown to El Salvador in March, and said he was inclined to order civil servants to provide more information about the agreement between the American and Salvadoranian governments.

The questions raised by Judge James E. Boasberg came to a hearing before the Federal District Court in Washington, where lawyers of the deported men claim that the government had sent her to a prison in El Salvador under an obvious agreement with the Salvadoran government to facilitate her return to US floor.

In the past few weeks, lawyers of the American Civil Liberties Union of judges have raised orders in several courts throughout the country that keep the Trump administration from using the Law on External enemies, a law of the 18th century war to have been accused of being accused of a terrorism prison in El Salvador be.

But at least so far, the lawyers have protected about 140 Venezuelan migrants who are already in Salvadoran custody after the United States had sent them to charter flights on March 15th.

The hearing in Washington on Wednesday evening was partly led by two important topics: What role the Trump government played primarily in the detention of men in the Salvadorical prison and whether officials could be held accountable to bring them back to the United States.

In order to answer the first of these questions, Richter Boasberg pushed a lawyer of the Ministry of Justice about a recent by President Trump to Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoraian man who was incorrectly shown to El Salvador in the same flights as the Venezuelan migrants.