close
close

Stephen Miller, consultant of the Top White House

Stephen Miller, Top Trump consultant, told the reporters on Friday that the administration ends the possibilities of ending the proper procedural protection for non -authorized immigrants who are in the country.

“The constitution is clear, and of course this is the highest law of the country that the privilege of the Habeas Corpus can be suspended in a time of the invasion. So I would say that this is an action that we actively consider,” said Miller in the driveway of the White House.

“A lot of it depends on whether the dishes do the right thing or not,” said Miller.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for clarification as to whether it referred to a certain group of people who have illegally entered the country, or to all persons who have it. It was also not commented on what he said under the dishes to do “the right thing”.

In his comments, Miller claimed that the courts are not responsible in immigration cases. “The courts are not only in the war against the executive, the courts are also in the war, these radical judges judges also with the legislative. So all this will inform the decisions that the president ultimately makes,” he said.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed frustration on the protection of the constitutional procedure, which slows down his efforts to shed up mass shifts.

“I was chosen to get hell out of them and the dishes stop me from it,” he said in an interview with Kristen Welker, which was broadcast on NBC News' “Meet the Press” on Sunday.

Welker pointed out that the fifth change in the US constitution states that “nobody” is being robbed without a legal sentence of life, freedom or property and that the Supreme Court has long recognized that citizens have not had certain fundamental rights, but Trump complained that these protective measures took too much time.

“I don't know. It seems – that could say, but if you talk about it, we would have to do a million or 2 million or 3 million attempts,” he said, adding that some of the people who want to deport the administration are “murderer” and “drug dealers”.

Welker then asked if he had to maintain the constitution.

“I don't know,” replied Trump. “I have to answer by saying again that I work brilliant lawyers for myself, and they are obviously followed by what the Supreme Court said.”

A clause in the constitution states that adequate process protection can be suspended during an invasion: “The privilege of the Habeas Corpus is not exposed to unless the public security can may require this in cases of rebellion or invasion.”

Trump claimed that the United States had entered March when he called the rarely used extraterrestrial enemy law to send alleged members of the Venezuelan gang tren de Aragua to a prison in El Salvador.

The proclamation said that the gang “tries to carry out and threaten an invasion or a predatory idea against the United States territory”. Three federal judges in different countries have found that the gang's criminal activities are not synonymous with an invasion.

The Supreme Court did not burden itself on the invasion question, but found in a judgment last month that the people who wanted to deport the government are entitled to a proper procedure. “AEA prisoners must receive a termination according to the date of this order.

In an essay for the National Constitution Center, lawyer Neal Katyal and then judge – and now judge of the Supreme Court – Amy Coney Barrett wrote: “A suspension is only temporary, but the authority that gives it is unusual. If suspension is actually a suspension, the president can typically be adhered to by subordinate people without an indefinite person Legal review on an update. ”

The letter from Habeas Corpus was suspended four times after this essay, even during the civil war across the country. The last time was after the attack on Pearl Harbor in Hawaii.

Leave a Comment