What does the society of pollution cost for society? Trump says zero.

The White House has instructed the federal authorities to no longer take into account the economic damage caused by climate change in the writing of regulations, except in cases in which it is “clear”.

The guideline effectively issues a powerful instrument that has been used by the federal government for more than two decades to weigh the costs and advantages of a specific guideline or regulation.

The bidet management had used the tool to strengthen the limit values ​​for greenhouse gas emissions by cars, power plants, factories and oil refineries.

Known as “social carbon costs”, the metric reflects the estimated damage from global warming, including forest fires, floods and droughts. There are costs for the economy from a ton of carbon dioxide pollution, the main greenhouse gas that heats the planet.

When examining a regulation or politics to limit carbon pollution, the political decision -makers have weighed the costs of an industry of meeting this requirement against the economic effects of this pollution on society.

During the Obama government, the economists in the White House calculated the social costs of carbon to $ 42 per ton. The first Trump government lowered it to less than $ 5 per ton. As part of the bidges, the costs for inflation were adapted and increased to $ 190 per ton.