Taylor Swift in Blake Lively against Justin Baldoni lawsuit

In a wild turn that nobody saw, Taylor Swift was charged in the chaotic legal showdown between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni about their film, which it ends with us.

Yes, this film. Although Swift was involved in the film close to zero, apart from the fact that you used your trail my tears in the Ricochet, she was somehow moved to the right -hand circus. A representative of the 35-year-old superstar made it crystal clear: this summons is only a boulevard bait, no real evidence.

According to Swift's team, she never joined the set, was not involved in the casting, never saw an editing, made no notes and only looked at the film after his release. She was on her record tour in 2023 and 2024 and literally appeared all over the world. Your only connection? She licensed a single song, just one of 19 other artists who did the same. The speaker made the summons as an obvious attempt to drive Swift's names for headlines instead of adhering to the actual facts of the case.

Now there is the chatter that Hugh Jackman could also be charged, although insiders say that he and swift never stood and be used to the drama to create a distraction. Another source informed people that the actual focus should be on the disturbing allegations by Lively and the Vor suit launched by Baldoni.

The 37-year-old Blake Lively sued her with us co-star and director Baldoni in December, and accused him of making sexual harassment, unprofessional behavior, and started a smear campaign when she pushed back. The 41 -year -old Baldoni shot back with a defamation and blackmail and claimed that her husband Ryan Reynolds and her PR team lively tried to sabotage him.

What does that have to do with Swift? Well, Baldoni claims that she and Reynolds were at a meeting in the couple's penthouse and that Swift Lively's script described and supposedly put him under pressure with their version. He even referred to a text in which he vividly said that their changes were “so much funnier and interesting”, but claimed that the praise felt forced due to Swift and Reynolds that Reynolds were present. LIVELY apparently replied by called Khaleesi and synchronized Swift and newly synchronized her “dragon” and later her “dance mothers Level Bühnenmütter”.

It does not stop here to have recused Reynolds to have ridiculed him in Deadpool & Wolverine through a new “nice” version of the character, the lines like “Where in God's name is the intimacy coordinator?” Outputs? And praises Ladypool (played by Lively) for the “snap” after the baby. On the other hand, Lively claims that Baldoni displaced her after the birth of the film after birth.

The court proceedings, Lively v. Wayfarer Studios et al. As for Swift, your team has not withdrawn and clearly wants to get it out of the boulevard drama.

Jamie Wells has a knack for getting Hollywood's greatest stars and aspiring talents in the Inside Scoop. With a sharp eye for industry trends and an ear for viral moments, Jamie covers everything, from events in the red carpet to drama in the drama behind the scenes in films, television and celebrity culture.

Latest posts by Jamie Wells (see all)