Taylor Swift does not want a part of Blake Lively's legal dispute

It seems that Taylor Swift officially pulled in Blake Lively and Justin Baldonis Legal Drama. The singer (and the long -standing beast from Lively) was charged as a witness to Baldoni's team last week.

As short It ends with uswhich is imposed on a flood of tabloid attention and a slander -in pattern from Baldoni. (He claims that Lively had kidnapped the film from him and then invented her claims to keep him calm.) Lively's well-documented friendship with Swift entered the picture in January when an SMS contained in Baldonis contained in Baldoni, which put LIVELY friendships under pressure. In the alleged message, Lively seemed to refer to Swift, as did her husband Ryan Reynolds as “dragon” to her “Khaleesi”.

Since then, boulevard newspapers have speculated that the friendship between Swift and Lively is on the rocks, while Swift seems to be publicly distant from the entire torture – it has not performed with Lively since they were discovered in October with Reynolds and Travis Kelce.

The summon means that it enters the legal foray in an even greater way – although it sounds as if it were very happy to be excluded from this narrative. In a explanation sent to the cut and other outlets, Swift's speaker beat the summons as a trick to create “Boulevard -Clickbait”, and argued that the singer had no actual connection It ends with us Or something else that is related to the duel suits.

“Taylor Swift never put on the set of this film, she was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not evaluate the film, she never saw an editing or made notes to the film, she didn't even see It ends with us To weeks after his public publication and traveled the biggest tour in history for the globe in 2023 and 2024, ”said her representative.

The only real connection that Swift has according to her statement was that she approved one of her songs, “My Tears Ricochet”, to use it in it – “which 19 other artists did”. The summons added: “Should use the name of Taylor Swift to arouse the public interest by creating boulevard -clickbait instead of concentrating on the facts of the case.”

The Lively team also returned against the summons against Swift – which she described “a woman who put in millions of the world”. In a statement on the deadline, and Baldoni's team accused “to continue to transform a case of sexual harassment and retaliation in entertainment for the tabloid that suggests that they sell tickets for a concert garden.

“This is a very serious legal issue, not the circus of Barnum & Bailey,” they said.

Lively and Baldoni will be brought to trial in March 2026, although at the moment it is unclear whether Taylor is really the point of view. But it all seems a pretty suitable landscape to finally drop Call (Taylor's version)not true?