Make right family IDs after 3 claim claims in the racist Rochester Video Case

After two false leads, the Naacp Rochester chapter now believes that the police have correctly identified a child's family, which was searched for with racist blur in a local park.

The organization said on Monday that three separate families claimed to be involved after a crowdfunding campaign to support the child. However, the first two families were discredited after another family was in the police after a community center organized by the NAACP last week.

The NAACP said that no funds were distributed to one of the families because the Rochester police authority continues its investigation. The incident that shows that a woman has become racist legs in a child who is assumed that they are only five years old in the past few weeks, which led to a widespread condemnation of the local guides.

“All funds collected are put in a trust that is devoted to supporting the needs of the child,” said Rochester Naacp in an explanation. “This trust is determined in coordination with suitable legal representatives to ensure transparency, integrity and long -term support for the child and his family.”

The efforts to identify the boy's family in the video began, as a person who claimed to represent the family, went to the NAACP and asked for a direct check from the organization. After a second family was submitted, a police report was submitted this time, according to the organization with the first person with the first person.

However, the situation only became more complicated when a third family turned to the NAACP on May 8th after the town hall. The NAACP advised the family to immediately turn with the local police.

“New evidence from the city of Rochester's police department last weekend showed that the second family was not the right family of sacrifices,” wrote the Rochester Naacp. The local police, added to the group, has since “confirmed with 100% trust that the third family was the right family.”

The Rochester police did not immediately answer specific questions about the examination, and only said that the department “received new information that has been conflict with original statements about this incident”.