Qatargate scandal reveals deep putrefaction in Israel's defense system – Sri Lanka Guardian

An insightful exposé of Hair net has caused controversy in Israel and laid light on the admissible attitude of the Ministry of Defense towards Weapons Sales to questionable regimes – especially Qatar, a nation that is often accused of supporting Hamas. The revelations come in the middle of a growing scandal as “Qatargate”, in which prominent Israeli figures for the potentially endangered national security are examined in exchange for profit.

The focus of the investigation is Israel Einhorn and Yonatan Urich, both close employees of the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Urich, known as an important company behind Netanyahus aggressive public messaging campaigns, is suspected of selling sensitive specialist knowledge to Qatar.

To defend urich and unicorn, lawyer Amit Hadad argued that Qatar was not officially classified as a “enemy country” – a legal gap that reminds of the defense of Nahum Mantar in the 1990s, which sold materials to the Iranian program for chemical weapons. While Mantar's shops with Iran stood and at that time it was not officially described by an enemy state, the parallels are worrying. Both cases, critics argue, represent a disturbing prioritization of profit to security and morality.

The Hair net The report accuses the Department of Department of Israel to promote a culture in which the sale of weapons, services and know-how as “childcare” is treated-regardless of the geopolitical consequences. Two examined units are the Defense Exports Control Agency (API) and the Director of Safety of the Defense Equipment (Malmab), which monitor the approval of such exports. According to the report, these authorities are with conflicts of interest and dominated by former military and intelligence staff who are moving seamlessly between government roles and lucrative private activities.

In a damn criticism, Hair net It is found that the cultural culture of the ministry has transformed regulatory supervision into a formality. Defense exports achieved a record of 13 billion US dollars in 2023 and positioned Israel among the ten best global arms exporters. While the report determines that most of this trade, such as the USA, EU nations and India, has enabled the same mechanisms with regimes that are known for violations of human rights and in Katar's case, which are connections to terrorism.

Further aggravating matters are the inclusion of the former Mossad officer “S.” – A business partner of Maj. Gen. (res.) Yoav (poli) Mordechai, a respected number within the hostage directorate. S. reports that his double role in private business and his official support of Israeli agencies praised. While Mordechai denied any knowledge of misconduct, the case has brought a shadow over high -ranking business of the officials after completing the conclusion.

Urich and Einhorn claim that they are targeted and pointed out that many high -ranking personalities – including Mossad veterans and Mordechai themselves – did business in Qatar. Her defense suggests that the security elite of Israel has blurred the boundaries between national duty and personal enrichment.

The IDF replied with an explanation that supported Mordechai's work and emphasized that its business transactions were disclosed and checked. They praised his professional integrity and found his essential contributions to ongoing hostage negotiations since the beginning of the war.

Nevertheless, critics ask difficult questions: Who keeps the defense company Israel accountable? Will the Ministry of Defense revise its export controls or will it continue to make an eye in favor of income and influence?

While the Qatargate scandal unfolds, the echoes of past controversies – and the warning signs that are not observed are back in the foreground. As Hair net Warn, if no sensible reforms are implemented, the unchecked power of the Ministry of Defense can continue to endanger security, ethics and the international reputation of Israel.