Taylor Swift's legal team speaks against Justin Baldoni summons in Blake Lively case

The right -wing team from Taylor Swift has in charge of Justin Baldoni's summons of being ejected from Blake Lively.

The message of the summons arose at the end of April and deals with the accusations for sexual harassment, retaliation and defamation in connection with the filming It ends with us – The 2024 film that Baldoni staged together with Lively and played in the leading role.

Now Swift's law firm Venable has spoken about the summons and described it as a “abuse of the discovery process”, which is intended to distract from the present case. Your registration was shared on Monday (May 12th) and on Tuesday (13) and explained how neither the pop star nor your team had something to do with the topics addressed in the lawsuit.

In the performance they shared (about Advertising board): “Venable had nothing to do with the film or one of the on the basis of the on the basis of claims or defense. There is no reason for this summons, except to distract from the facts of the case and to impose an impartial burden and costs.”

When the application for the summons was issued for the first time, he called Swift – who is a friend of Lively – as a witness and claimed that the pop star was present for discussions between Lively and Baldoni about a scene at the beginning of the film.

It was said that Lively Baldoni invited to her residence in New York City to talk about possible screenplay changes, and Baldoni was surprised to see that Swift and Lively's husband Ryan Reynolds were there too. He claims that Swift and Reynolds approved the proposed version of the LIVELY scene in question and put him under pressure to accept the revisions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlet_u31m4m

The original registration also nodded Swift and Reynolds, including text messages, in which apparently referred to the two of them as “dragons” game of ThronesYou will appreciate that I am Khaleesi and how you, I happen to have a few dragons. For good worse, but usually better. Because my dragons also protect those for whom I fight. “

Elsewhere in the latest development, Swift's lawyers claimed that the director should only have communication between LIVELY and her husband and that the name of the pop star is a “abuse of the discovery process”.

This is based on comments that the team shared last week, with their sound: “Taylor Swift never stopped the set of this film, it was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not evaluate the film, she never saw processing or made notes on the film.” It also added that their connection too It ends with us is limited to the licensing of a song “My Tears Ricochet”.

Apart from that, guy It ends with us Actor Isabela Ferrer told Extra This Swift helped her to get in character to play the younger version of Lively's character.

“This document pre -charging is designed in such a way that you use the name of Taylor Swift to arouse the public interest by creating boulevard clickbait instead of concentrating on the facts of the case,” added Swift spokesman last week.

The legal dispute began in December last December, when Lively at the California Civil Rights Department against Baldoni submitted a complaint for sexual harassment and retaliation. In it, she accused him of the “inappropriate and undesirable behavior” and claimed that he was trying to “destroy” her reputation.

Baldoni rejected all the allegations and countered on January 16, including Reynolds and publicist Leslie Sloane. After the promotion of LIVELY, Baldoni was dropped by his talent agency William Morris Endavour (WME). He had also lifted a women's solidarity prize.