close
close

Support the ranking examination of the IWA-RFC to the death of Autwerkork Ronald Adams Sr.!

Ronald Adams, Sr. [Photo by Adams Family]

The WSWS calls on the worker to obtain information and support this investigation. Fill out the form In the end, send us your comments.

The socialist party of equality and the World Socialist website Support the call of the International Workers Alliance of Richt and File Committees (IWA-RFC) for an independent examination of rank and file workers completely avoidable death of Ronald Adams Sr.

Ronald Adams Sr., a 63-year-old machine repair man, was crushed to death on April 7, 2025 in the Dundee-Motor complex in Southeast Michigan. According to the first reports, he was killed in the early morning when he had served a Cinetic washing machine in the 7300 department when an overhead guarantee unexpectedly fiance, captured it and fatally crushed his upper body.

Ronald was a widespread and beloved figure that was known throughout the work not only for his extraordinary skills, but also for his unshakable commitment to security. Adams had referred to employees as “the protector of the plant” and deserved the trust of his surroundings.

He leaves a large and grieving family. He was a committed husband of the Shanaia Stewart Adams, a proud father of 10 children and a grandfather of eleven years in their mixed family as well as a mentor and coach of many young people in his community. His death left a family offer and a job in mourning, with employees and relatives united in the demand for truth and accountability.

More than five weeks after Adam's death, Stellantis, the United Auto Workers (UAW) and the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Miosha) have no explanation for why this disaster occurred. There are more questions than answers: Was the safety blocking system compromised? Has the crane crane already working? Have a lack of employees, acceleration requirements or cost reduction measures contributed to the fatal incident? Which specific security violations or systemic errors made it possible?

On Wednesday, Miosha rejected an application for freedom of information (Freedom of Information Act), which was submitted by the WSWS, and claimed that the public would impair his investigation. Miosha's letter argued that “external interventions” could affect testimony and the integrity of the examination.

In fact, this is a serious reference to a cover-up coverage, an attempt to protect corporate and union officers from the exam, while preparing white wash to free those responsible.

Leave a Comment