Taylor Swift moved into a Liveliv-Baldoni lawsuit

Load

How did Swift react?

A spokesman for Swift contested any participation, apart from the licensing of her song for the film, which several other artists did.

“This document pre -charging is designed in such a way that you use the name of Taylor Swift to arouse the public interest by creating boulevard -clickbait instead of concentrating on the facts of the case” Cnn.

“Swift never kept the set of this film, it was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not evaluate the film, she never saw an editing or made notes about the film, she didn't even see It ends with us To weeks after his public release and traveled around the globe in 2023 and 2024. “

Load

What do others say?

A spokesman for LIVELY described the summons as an attempt to “transform sexual harassment and retaliation in entertainment for the tabloids”.

“This is a very serious legal issue, not the circus of Barnum & Bailey,” they said loudly People. “The accused continue to push in public, shame, shape and attack the rights and reputation of women.”

Is there a statement of blackmail now?

On May 14th, Baldoni's lawyers from LIVELY accused the lawyers to blackmail Swift, and claimed that they asked “to publish a support for lively, and stated that if Swift refused to publish private text messages from personal nature.

According to a letter submitted by Baldoni's lawyer at the court, Swift allegedly “addressed these inappropriate and apparently blackmail threats”.

However, the LIVELY lawyer denied the allegations and described them as “no longer against reality”.

Find the next television, streaming series and films to add your must. Get the observation list every Thursday.