Justin Baldonis Blake Lively-Taylor Swift-Track claims thrown out

A The judge quickly attempted Justin Baldoni's lawyer to use this It ends with us Legal dispute to accuse Blake Lively of blackmailing Taylor Swift, and said that the submission is inappropriate and invites “transparently a press opening” without providing relevant information in the case of the Federal Court.

The order, who acted on Thursday (May 15th) by judge Lewis J. Liman, beats the lawyer of Baldoni Bryan FreedmanThe letter of just one day before, in which he claimed that an unnamed source had told him to have asked SWIFT, to delete text messages and publish private communication, unless the pop star had expressed public support for their sexual harassment and retaliation against Baldoni.

The LIVELY legal team quickly rejected the allegations as “categorically wrong” and “completely not from reality” and said that such claims have no place in the court file. Judge Liman agreed a few hours later and wrote that Freedman's letter is “inappropriate and has to overturn”.

“The only purpose of the letter is to promote the public scandal by raising inflammatory accusations, information and faith against Lively and her lawyer,” the judge wrote. “It transparently invites you to a press opening by suggesting that Lively and her lawyer tried to” blackmail “a well -known celebrity. The bond of the letter on the file would not be useful for the court.”

Judge Liman wrote that the Federal Supreme Court should not be “co -opted” after the case law of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in order to “promote scandal that arises from unpigured, potentially defamed statements”.

“The lawyer is pointed out that future abuse of the court share could be made with sanctions,” wrote Richter Liman.

The representatives of LIVELY celebrated the decision on Thursday with a spokesman for the actress in an explanation: “The Court of Justice took less than 24 hours to enforce Mr. Freedman's irrelevant, inappropriate and inflammatory accusations, to delete them from the court and to warn Mr. Freedman that further incorrect customers can be met with sanctions.”

Freedman did not give back a request for comments.

Swift's representatives did not comment on the lively blacksmiths, but they criticized Baldoni last week because they have drawn the pop superstar It ends with us Legal dispute over a summons.

“The connection that Taylor had to this film allowed the use of a song” My Tears Ricochet “,” said Swift spokesman for Swift at that time. “In view of the fact that their participation was to licensing a song for the film that 19 other artists also did, this document load is designed in such a way that it uses the name of Taylor Swift to arouse the public interest by creating boulevard -clickbait instead of concentrating on the facts of the fall.”

Lively claims in the case that Baldoni, her co-star and director of the film published last summer, harassed her sexually on the set and then orchestrated a public relation smear campaign to reciprocate against her after complaining.

Swift was brought into battle when Baldoni Lively countered for defamation, and claimed that the actress had seen her relationship with a “megaackelebrity friend” who was considered a Swift It ends with us.

Baldoni's legal registration contained text messages for a suspected session in which “Ryan and Taylor” took part, apparently Swift and Lively's husband Ryan Reynolds move into. In a message sent by LIVELY, actress Swift and Reynolds called their “most trustworthy partners” and compared them to the “dragons” on the show game of Thrones.

“The news could not have been clearer,” wrote the lawyers from Baldonis. “Baldoni was not only to do with Lively. He also stood with Lively's 'Dragons', two of the most influential and wealthy celebrities in the world who were not afraid to make things very difficult for him.”