Why was Blake Lively accused of blackmail Taylor Swift?

The Fallout by Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively's time on the set of It ends with us I just won't stop. And in the latest development, Taylor Swift seems to be drawn into the mix.

Taylor Swift and Blake Lively have been close friends for a decade, provided Swift is apparently the Patin Lively and Ryan Reynold's daughters. They were discovered for the first time in 2015, but their close friendship was cemented when a photo in 2016 was posted by Swift's notorious party on July fourth. Since then, they have been packed together countless times and have supported the work of the other many times, with Lively even sitting in Swift's private box during the Super Bowl 2024.

But this week things look a bit dice because Swift's name was repeatedly brought up during the promotion of It ends with us And Baldoni's lawsuit against Ryan Reynolds and LIVELY.

If you are as confused as we do, let us break it up for you.

How was Taylor Swift primarily drawn in?

Apart from her close friendship with LIVELY, Swift's only commitment to the film, It ends with uswas the recording of her song “My Tears Ricochet” in the trailer and film. Baldoni at that time approved Lively for securing the song for the film and later spoke of Swift very much when he was asked about the recording of the song. “All of her songs are great, we could have put every song up there,” said Lively The Hollywood reporter At the premiere of the film. “We could have done like a language memo song, it would have been the best song ever in a film.”

During the film's advertising trip in August 2024, Swift was mentioned a few times by Lively and Baldoni. The latter even claimed that she had helped fill Isabella Ferrer to play a younger version of Lily Bloom.

Then in December according to an internet breaker report from The New York Times, LIVELY filed a lawsuit against Baldoni for sexual harassment and accused him of saying goodbye to a “social manipulations” campaign to “destroy” her reputation.

LIVEONI predicted by Lively and Reynolds for 400 million US dollars, which prepares extortion and defamation. In the 179-page complaint, Baldoni referred to a “Megacelelebrity friend” by LIVELY's, apparently during a meeting about a scene in the film at home, and Baldoni interpreted this as a kind of intimidation tactics, which made him feel that he had to comply with her opinion before the scene. Although the celebrity name was reduced from the document, Baldoni mentioned a “Taylor” in a text, and the fans of Eagle Eyed joined their own points.

Since then, things have become even more messy if you can believe it. LIVELY did not compete in the Super Bowl as in 2024, and the people on Reddit have also said that Swift's friend Travis Kelce Reynolds did not follow on Instagram.

Now Swift has been charged as a witness for the upcoming legal proceedings between Baldoni and Lively and Reynolds, and Messy is (again) becoming even chazi.

Why was Taylor Swift pre -charged in the lawsuit by Justin Baldoni?

On May 14th, Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman claimed that he had received a tip that Lively's lawyer had contacted lawyer and asked for Swift to publish a public confirmation from LIVELY. According to Freedman, “it would be released if Ms. Swift refused that Ms. Swift refused, private text messages in personal nature in Ms. Lively's possession”.

Especially 10 years of private text messages between alive and fast. Freedman signed an affidavit that was claimed that Lively's lawyer “asked Ms. Lively's name that Taylor Swift submitted a social media declaration this year, and explained if Ms. Swift did not do this, Ms. Lively '10 years of private texts in private with Ms. Swift 'by Ms. Swift.

“These demands are no longer completely not from reality.

Taylor Swift's answer to summons in the lawsuit of Justin Baldoni

Although the situation is a bit confusing overall, Swift's statement about your summons could not be clearer. By an explanation of published by TMZSwift's team said:

“Taylor Swift never set the set of this film, it was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not rate the film, she never saw an editing or made notes about the film.

“The connection that Taylor had to this film allowed the use of a song” My Tears Ricochet “. In view of the fact that her participation was to licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document forward is designed in such a way that it uses the name of Taylor Swift to wake up the public interest by creating boulevard clickbait,, Instead of concentrating on the facts of the case.

It is legally not possible to reject a summons, but the right team from Swift can apply for the summons to be ejected, and that is exactly what your legal team did. The request from Baldonis Lege Team, to all communications between Swift's legal team, Lively, Reynolds, and your legal team, is a “fishing expedition”.

Blake Lively's reaction to Taylor Swift summons in the lawsuit of Justin Baldoni

In response to Justin Baldoni's summons of Taylor Swift, the LIVELY lawyer denied the claims of blackmail to publish the following declaration PEOPLE:

“This is categorically wrong.

This is what we expected from the Wayfarer parties' lawyers who seem to love without evidence at first, and without evidence and without concern for the people who harm them in this process. We will submit applications to the court directly to blame these lawyers for their misconduct. “