Adu-Boahene, woman and 2 others who were officially charged with alleged corruption scandal of $ 7 million

The Attorney General Dominic Ayine officially charged the general director of the former National Signal Bureau (NSB), General Director Kwabena Adu Boahene, and his wife Angela Adjei Boateng in the amount of several million Cedis.

Together with two others, Mildred Donkor and Advantage Solutions Limited, they are charged with eleven crimes, including theft, money laundering, anesthesia due to incorrect preliminary walls and deliberately financial losses.

According to the letter submitted in court on Wednesday, April 30, Mr. Adu-Boahene, who was too responsible for monitoring the critical national security infrastructure, including contracts with foreign companies, was too responsible for buying a contract with an Israeli company, ISC Holdings Limited, for $ 7 million.

In total, ADU-Boahene is said to have transferred around 49 million GHS (around $ 7 million) from the NSB funds to its personal accounts and incorrectly justify these transactions as payments for the cyber defense systems together with its accomplice.

“Further investigations have shown that the Bureau of National Communication or the successor authority, the National Signals Bureau or from the Ghana government, was not received by the description of the description in January 30, 2020, the Bureau of National Communication” Myoyonline given.

The wife of Adu-Boahene, Angela Adjei Boateng, is one of three directors from Advantage Solutions Limited, the only shareholder of the BNC Communications Bureau Limited.

Mildred Donkor is a former bank relationship officer of Adu-Buahene, his wife and BNC Communications Bureau Limited.

Also read: EOCO arrests the former deputy DG of the National Signal Bureau

BNC was created by Adu-Boahene and his wife when he was still the NSB boss, and the company was used for the transaction of the security system bought by the Israeli company ISC Holdings Limited.

While an initial payment of 9.5 million GHS (about 1.75 million US dollars) was transferred to ISC Holdings, no further payments were made to the company.

Instead, the following funds were diverted for personal use, including investments and transmissions to unknown parties.

In the court documents it was claimed that ADU-Boahene, his wife and Mildred “therefore an elaborate criminal company with A4 (Advantage Solutions Limited) were carried out as a holding company through which the stolen funds were indebted and washed”.

The documents added that A4 as a holding company received a significant part of the stolen funds for several subsidiaries, including the private BNC, which were then invested in the business activities of the subsidiaries by their shareholders and directors, including investments in treasury bills, real estate, the production of fertiliscoriscories and the rental of luxury cars to translate customers.

Mr. Adu Boahene was arrested on Thursday, March 20, at Kotoko International Airport after returning from abroad through the National Investigations Bureau (NIB) with regard to the scandal, a deposit was later granted.

In the meantime, Mr. Adu Boahene and his wife have a defamation against the Attorney General and the Minister of Justice Dr. Dominic Ayine submitted for defamation about statements that were held on the matter during a press conference on March 24, 2025.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs stated that Dr. Ayine's public remarks incorrectly represented them as criminals and fraudsters who had undermined state funds and involved money laundering.

They added that these accusations have severely damaged their reputation and caused distress, public ridiculousness and emotional damage, in particular the effects on their children, which were reported reported in school.

Several complaints are listed in the claim to the claim, including:

The plaintiffs publicly branded as criminals in front of a court ruling.
Distribution of false accusations of the plaintiffs' travel history and financial transactions.
Violation of national security laws by uncovering sensitive matters.
Use of media cinemas to determine your guilt and to propose the custody penalties prematurely.
The plaintiffs argue that these actions of malice and an abuse of authority were driven to cause maximum reputation damage.

You are therefore looking for the following relief:

Exemplary and sentence replacement against the accused for the publication and/or radiation of very offensive, defamatory material and in relation to the plaintiffs in his press conference of March 24, 2025.
II. An order of the constant injunction, which limits the accused by further publication and/or radio or the publication and/or radiation of the plaintiff's mentioned or similar words.

III. Costs, including the lawyer's professional fees.

The full court document is attached.

Liability exclusion: The views, comments, opinions, contributions and statements by readers and participants on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or the guideline of the Multimedia Group Limited.