Blake Lively Sports Kühner new look in the middle of the legal dispute

The It ends with us Legal dispute Wages on, with split claims and submissions before the temporarily planned court appointment in March 2026.

Therefore progress that the life of the stars involved is still progressing. While Justin Baldoni has decided on a more reluctant presence in the social media landscape, Blake Lively is again to publish daily excerpts on the go.

The 37 -year -old actress has recently taken over a typical example of her Instagram stories Give a look at her process that prepared for a party of the 90s and decided to give himself a spunken revision.

Blake shared a selfie before the event. After her hair was bound with several colorful butterfly brackets, a pink pearl chain dangled from her telephone shell and wore a *nsync t-shirt with a flannel that is bound around her waist. Plus bright, glittering pop-inspired make-up and a necklace with “baby” for baby spice, alias Emma Bunton.

“Don't invite me to a party of the 90s if you want Grunge.” She explained. “I live and die from glitter pop. 4lyfe. 143” In the following with another picture of your guard with a spice girl.

“I've had this watch since the age of 10. This is the problem for Hoarders,” said Blake. “Moments of validation if you have a reason to say: 'You see! I knew why I kept it for 27 years !! for tonight !!'”

Instagram

“Also. Let's be real. This watch is a treasure. And my baby chain that I had for as long.”

As for the It ends with us The last update included Blake and her close friend Taylor Swift, with a claim by Justin's lawyer Bryan Freedman that Blake's lawyers had put Taylor under pressure to publicly support her friend on social media so that text messages are “leaked” between them.

Instagram

Soon afterwards, a judge opened the claims, and Justin's lawyer said they came from a source near the pop star. Blake's own legal team soon shared his own position.

“The Court took less than 24 hours to enforce Mr. Freedman's irrelevant, improper and inflammatory allegations, to make them, remove them from the court and to warn Mr. Freedman that further misconduct can be met with sanctions,” it says.

© Getty Images

Justin's team also charged Taylor as a witness. Your team shared an explanation HELLO! That means: “Taylor Swift never set the set of this film, it was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not achieve the film.

“The connection that Taylor had to this film allowed the use of a song,” My Tears Ricochet “. In view of the fact that her participation was a licensing of a song for the film, which also did 19 other artists, this document for the use of Taylor Swift's name was developed to draw the public interest by concentrating instead of concentrating, instead of concentrating, instead of concentrating to concentrate on the facts of the case. “