“It is a scandal”: anger as prisoners who are trapped in an indefinite prison grounds that are excluded from the program to release the prison room

Without prisoners who are captured from new measures to relieve hundreds of urgently needed prison cells, which are captured under the undefined reasons of prison, were “morally wrong” and a “missed opportunity”.

This week, the Minister of Justice announced in emergency measures to automatically release criminals because after 28 days they had violated their license conditions to prevent prisons from being achieved in a few months.

But those who serve an “inhumane” prison sentence for public protection (IPP) in which thousands of years are in prison for years than their original term or in a recall merry-GO-round cannot be justified for the recall publication scheme.

A work colleague has blown up the exclusion as a “scandal on a scandal” because activists warn that the move to IPP prisoners could lead to more suicide and self-harm after 94 have already taken their lives in custody.

The controversial open prison conditions were presented in 2005 to be hard in 2005. They were scrapped in 2012 due to human rights concerns, but not retrospectively, so that the prison sentences that have already been detained were enclosed until they can prove that they are safe for the release.

They are then subject to strict license conditions, in which they can be withdrawn into prison for indefinite times due to smaller violations, e.g. B. an outcome lock.

More than 1,500 of the 2,544 prisoners who spotted in prison are in the recall inside.

Seven out of ten more than 1,000 prisoners have not committed another crime, but are held indefinitely until the re-publication of the probation advertisement, which takes an average of 26 months.

“This is not only inhuman and unfair, it is morally wrong and a waste of taxpayers money,” a spokesman for the United Group told IPP (Ungripp) to reform The independent.

“The government could help to repair the prison crisis by releasing the problem with IPP as a whole or at least those who have not committed another crime, which would completely empty one of the greatest prisons. This lack of measure is a deliberate choice of current government minister.”

Experts said that it was “fundamentally wrong” that the government continues to spend up to £ 145 million every year in order to lock prisoners because of a prison sentence Brands in inhumane from the UNWhile he was blewing against the level of resources from the judicial committee.

After the terms of prison have also been excluded from the government's early publication program, which has freed more than 16,000 inmates after only 40 percent of its prison sentence, and the upcoming review of Labor's assessments to facilitate the overcrowding of David Gauke.

The reformed IPP-prisoner Marc Conway, one of the heroes of the terrorist attack of the fishmakers, fears that it will trigger a new self-harm, and shows that the government has “no appetite” to tackle the scandal.

He said: “It is very disappointing that IPP prisoners were excluded from a review of the conviction – in particular to remember the current changes. If they are IPP, they will be punished again and again.”

He said hundreds of prisoners called back on Ipp “don't earn it there”.

“It is not only wrong and a waste of taxpayers, but also inhumane,” he added.

“I think the government should be embarrassed. You have to understand that every missed opportunity to deal with the IPP scandal will cause more deaths and more self-harm.”

Shocking examples of the IPP sentence, which is highlighted by The independent Integrate Leroy Douglas, who served for almost 20 years for theft of a mobile phone. Thomas White, 42, who stood in his cell and served for the theft of a phone for 13 years; And Abdullahi Suleman, 41, who was still detained 19 years after his detention because of a laptop robbery.

Mandy Lawrence, whose son James threatened his eight-month minimum tariff for the threat of someone with a starting pistol, has still been in prison for 19 years after receiving an IPP-HABSPRAFSE. He is currently in HMP Highpoint without a publication date on his fifth recall.

The mother said it was “disgusting” that IPPS had been overlooked again, and added: “You don't take care of IPPS in any form or form.”

The activist Shirley Debono, whose son Shaun Lloyd is currently in prison during his fourth recall, said that it was another “slap in the face” for IPP prisoners.

Labor Peer Lord Woodley has submitted a law about private members to end what he calls “industrial scale misalignment of justice” by annoying all remaining IPP prisoners, but the government has refused to support this.

He said The independent: “In view of the desperate need for prison rooms, it is a scandal that is excluded via a scandal, and I ask the government to take courageous measures, including the sale, this stain of our judicial system for good – or at least those who live in the community in the community, to lend the slogan board as safe.”

Richard Garside, the director of the Center for Crime and Justice Studies, described the changes to the recall that concerns those concerned that serve certain sentences between one and four years as a “wrong answer to the right question” about overflowing prisons.

“It is the recall of those on IPP and other open sentences that have the greatest impact on the pressure of the prison population,” he said.

“Prison staff and prisoners earn better than this constant tinkering on the edges of the problem.”

A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said: “It is correct that IPP rates have been abolished. IPP prisoners are considered every two years by the independent slot board for release, and those who are classified as safe are released.

“The government supports IPP prisoners who earn their release, but this has to be done in a way that does not endanger the public.

“All criminals that serve a prison conditions of four years or more are excluded from this measure.”