The Republicans try to bring Trump's bill back into the right way with a rare Sunday session

Washington (AP) – The Republicans will try to bring their massive tax reduction and border security package back into the right course during a rare session of Sunday evening after the same body voted against A setback that spokesman Mike Johnson expanded two days ago two days ago tries to turn back quickly.

Deficit Hawks met the democratic legislator in the House budget Committee in order to vote against the measure of the measure for the entire house. For procedural reasons, five Republicans voted no, the other four concerns about the effects of the bill on federal budget deficits.

Johnson expressed confidence that the bill will come out of the committee and be on the house floor until the end of the week.

“This is the vehicle with which we will deliver the mandate that the American people gave us in the last elections,” he said in a FOX news interview that was broadcast on Sunday.

The Republicans, who criticized the measure, found that the new expenditure of the legislative template and tax reductions in the invoice are pre -intensive, while the measures to compensate for the costs are charged. For example, you would like to accelerate the new work requirements that the Republicans want to issue for work capable of work. These requirements would not be received until 2029 under the current invoice.

“We write checks that we cannot earn and our children will pay the price,” said Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, a member of the committee. “Something has to change or you won't get my support.”

Johnson said the start date for the work requirements was designed in such a way that the states have time to “rework their systems” and “ensure that all new laws and all new protective measures we place can actually be enforced”.

Roy was from Reps. Ralph Norman from South Carolina, Josh Brecheen from Oklahoma and Rep. Andrew Clyde from Georgia. MP Lloyd Smucker from Pennsylvania switched his voice to no in a procedural step, so that it could be reconsidered later after he was confident that the Republicans would “do this”. Johnson said that the talks were continued with her concerns on Sunday.

Remarkably, the vote against the further development of the law came after President Donald Trump asked the Republicans in a social media post to unite.

“We don't need stands in the Republican Party,” said Trump. “Stop talking and do it!”

In essence, the extensive package extends permanently The existing income tax cuts This was approved during Trump's first term in 2017 and adds temporary new ones for which the President fought in 2024, including No taxes on tipsPayment of overtime and car loan interest. The measure also proposes great expenses for border security and defense.

The committee for a responsible federal budget, an impartial Fiscal Watchdog group, estimates that the house law develops To add around 3.3 trillion dollars in the next decade.

Democrats are overwhelming against the measure that the Republicans described as “a large, beautiful Bill Act”. Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash.

“This expenditure account is terrible and I think the American people know that,” said Rep. Jim Clyburn, ds.c., to CNN's “State of the Union” on Sunday. But there is a problem when this balance occurs on the back of workers and women. And that happens here. “

Johnson not only has to pronounce the concerns of the deficit falcons in his conference. It also looks under the pressure of headquarters, which will carefully observe the proposed changes to Medicaid, Food Support Programs and the background of tax credits for clean energy. The Republican legislator from New York and elsewhere also require a much state and local tax deduction.

In the invoice, the invoice proposes the invoice that currently triples an upper limit for the state and local tax deduction of 10,000 US dollars, which increases it to $ 400,000 per year to $ 30,000 for common filers.

MP Nick Lalota, one of the New York legislators who led the efforts to announce the upper limit, said they proposed a deduction of 62,000 US dollars for individual filers and $ 124,000.

If the legislation exceeds the house this week, he would move to the Senate, where Republican legislators also observe changes that could make the final passage in the house difficult.

Johnson said: “The package we send there will be one that has been negotiated very carefully and delicately balanced, and we hope that you will not make many changes because this quickly ensures his passage.”