Endless 'Kim Sae-Ron Skandal': truth still difficult to grasp in the middle of escalating demands

While internet users express fatigue to the ongoing printouts Kim Sae-Ron Controversy that now extend until the third month also demand that the truth is clearly unveiled. The photo comes from an earlier interview for the film Snow road.

The controversy around the late Kim Sae-Ron Wakes up through the public discourse. It has been almost two months since the family has been organized with the controversial channel Garo Sero Institute Remove alleged relationships with the actor Kim Soo-Hyunincluding claims on minor dating. At almost three months that have passed since her death, the problem remains unresolved, which leads to public tiredness and increasing demands to discover the truth.

Garo Sero Beginning Kim Sae-Ron During her minor years. These were shared almost every day for a month. During a recent press conference, however Kim Soo-Hyun The team refuted these claims and explained that all common materials were taken afterwards Kim Sae-Ron became an adult in 2019.

Shocking claims: from murderers to FBI investigations

Garo Seros The recent explosive claims claim that Kim Soo-Hyun Side offered billions of Koreans for audio files won a whistleblower and sent two hits after rejection to murder the whistleblower. They also claim that Korean and Chinese assassins entered the country via JFK Airport and that the FBI, not the local police, leads the investigation.

However, these allegations quickly lost credibility after the parties involved refused all claims within hours. The FBI examination and claims for attempts at assassination were found with widespread skepticism.

From the alleged AI language manipulation to Hitmen: The truth has doubts from the start

Added to this is the confusion, ask whether Kim Sae-Rons The voice was manipulated by AI DeepfaK technology.

lawyer Go sang-rok given, “Kim Se-Ui and BU Ji-Seok knowingly spread false information, even though they were aware of his potential falsehood. As a former journalist and lawyer, they had the professional duty to check facts, but deliberately ignored the complainant as a serious criminal.”

He terminated plans to submit charges for criminal defamation against Kim Se-Uilawyer BU Ji-SeokAnd the whistleblower for the spread of false information. Above all, Go sang-rok himself had been named in Garo Seros Press conference that was accused

Legal measures and prominent rejection: “Ai manipulated my voice”

SBS reporter Kang Kyung-Yoon Also initiated legal steps by submitting a complaint against Kim Se-Ui by Garo Sero the day after the press conference. In her blog she wrote “I saw stories about Deep Learning and Deepfake threats in the media, but I never thought I would be a victim. I asked the authorities to speed up the investigation.”

She refuted firm Garo Seros Claims, indication, “Everyone can see that the voice they claimed was manipulated with Ai to meet their narrative.” With regard to the whistleblower based in the USA, she added. “This fraudster turned to me at the beginning of April. I don't trust vague, money -looking sources like this, so I ignored them. I assumed that the people around me would do the same. The whole thing was a 'scam” from the start. “

Kim Se-Ui also accused Kang Kyung-Yoon To visit the house of the whistleblower in New Jersey and frighten it; However, Kang Kyung-Joon denied this and said, “I have never gained a foot in New Jersey, let alone spoke to the whistleblower.” In order to support her claim, she published official travel records that do not prove any entries or outputs between January 1 and May 5, 2025.

Other persons mentioned in the press conference, including Byun hee-jee And Kang Yong-SeokAlso all connection to refused to Kim Soo-Hyun Or his agency. Kang Yong-Seok given, “The leaked audio seems to have been manipulated with AI.” Byun hee-jee said “I don't even know who the whistleblower is – I never contacted it. I will submit a lawsuit.”

Actor What amaccused of the voice of the wife of the whistleblower, also clarified, “Apart from participating in the funeral, I have no connection to this case.”

While shocking revelations tend to draw attention, regardless of their truth, especially if they involve public numbers, false claims without solid evidence risk serious discussions. The legal process finally determines what is true. In the world of sensational exposes, however, it could not lead to a boomerang effect that hits harder than the original scandal.