The Supreme Court of Wisconsin publishes results of the investigation of the media leak

Madison, Wisconsin (Wbay) – The Supreme Court of Wisconsin published the results of an independent examination of an media leak in the case of Planned parenthood of Wisconsin against Urmanski.

The Supreme Court learned that a confidential design decision was passed on from the case to the media and that a judgment was cited by Wisconsinwatch.org. Judge said that the court had never experienced such a violation in his history.

The High Court published a reduced report by the investigator, which has excluded some names and e -mail addresses. Sixty -two people were interviewed, including the judges, employees and court officers, interns and other employees who had access to the judicial chambers or had knowledge of the draft of the order. The investigators also investigated computer network protocols, individual web surfing historia, e -mails and printer data.

The investigators found no evidence that the computer systems of the court were violated or the document was incorrectly sent to the media.

“The investigation came to the conclusion that the leak of the draft procurement draft was probably deliberately deliberately. However, no person could be identified as responsible for the leak,” concludes the examination overview. “No suspects were identified positively at this point.”

The investigation was suspended unless new information arises.

The Supreme Court discussed whether the abortion law of Wisconsin, which is formally known as Statut 940.04, impaired a person's right to physical integrity and autonomy. Whether the state had an appropriate interest in treating abortion providers differently than other health service providers; And violates freedom against the right of doctors by preventing them from treating patients in full their ability to match the needs of their patients.

The leaked draft was put together on June 13th. On June 26, Jack Kelly published an article about Wisconsin Watch, which matched the draft of June 13th. He quoted a sentence in which the state's Supreme Court said that he had mentioned the case of the case on the case, and further mentioned that the intervention efforts, the Wisconsin-Opposing laws, the Wisconsin campaign and the professional laws refused, the Wisconsin laws and professional law on life and professional Weshonsin, which are preserved.

The study found that the website visit protocols for June 13th to 26th were missing. This was held responsible for the preservation of data. “This failure ultimately led to the loss of critical information that is necessary for the investigation,” the report said.

The investigators also learned that documents are often left on printer shells after printing, and sometimes documents are sent to the wrong department for printing and never called up.

The investigation made a number of security recommendations, including:

• Do not allow employees to register for accounts for computers and block computers if they are not used.
• Employees demand that email accounts issue only issued by the government for official communications.
• Develop and enforce guidelines to maintain computer data immediately after an incident;
• Make sure that all doors are closed if the judicial chambers are not affected.
• Prevent unauthorized access to safe areas and keep the key cards up to date to ensure precise persecution.
• Use of manipulation -resistant, sealed packaging for hard copies of confidential documents to maintain a safe chain of custody;
• Shred documents immediately as soon as they are no longer needed, whether confidential or not;
• Call documents immediately from printers and remove unnecessary printer options from court computers.

Copyright 2025 Wbay. All rights reserved.