Trump to sign facilities of immigration while he approaches the first 100 days in office: Live updates

A judge stopped the cuts again for the time being. However, the details of what has happened in the agency, the banks and lender monitored and consumer protection laws are forced, are crucial for determining whether the shots can be continued. Hundreds of newly published agency notes, supplemented by narrative accounts submitted by more than 20 employees, were submitted to the Federal District Court in Washington before a hearing before a hearing before a hearing before judge Amy Berman Jackson.

Judge Jackson stopped the planned shots less than a day after the communications had dropped out and said that they went far beyond what the Court of Appeal allowed. From Tuesday, she will hold a two -day hearing to hand over testimony and decide whether to expand your order to block the shots.

The consumer office has been to the agency as a Trump officer since February and started to dismantle them. A number of decisions by the Federal Court prohibited the destruction of the agency. The agency founded the congress in 2011 to add protective measures to mortgages and other financial products for consumers, and only the congress has the authority to abolish them.

Mark Paoletta, the Chief Legal Officer of the agency and the mastermind behind the termination plan, defended the shots and said in a legal registration that they would be “right -sized” filled with “huge waste”. Russell Vouht, the budget director of the White House, who also acts as deputy director of the office, described the office as “Woke and Weaponized”.

If so many workers were to destroy the office of the office without a transitional period, the employees warned their bosses in e -mails, chat messages and verbal discussions according to court records. Within a few days, critical technical systems would fail that the enforcement lawyers would miss legal periods and agency data that the federal courts had saved would be lost, they said.

“I do not think that we can continue to operate for 60 days without keeping many of these people,” wrote Christopher Chilbert, Chief Information Officer of the Office, in an e -mail on the day on which the dismissals were announced.

Adam Martinez, the Chief Operating Officer of the agency, replied: “Understanding and I do not agree. We really have to spend the next week to find a way forward.”

Judge Jackson asked Gavin Kliger, a 25-year-old employee of Mr. Musks who carried out the terminations.

Mr. Kliger, a former Twitter summer intern, who had no experience in government work this year, joined the Office of Personal Management in January. He has executed orders for the Efficiency of the Ministry of Musk in at least nine agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service, in which it was recently replaced in at least nine agencies.

E -mails that were decided in the hours after the appeal court that the reductions of the employees could move forward, the officials of Mr. Musk, who strive as quickly as possible as possible, show that they seemed to be forgotten on which agency they concentrated.

Jeremy Lewin, a 28-year-old lawyer who heads the Foreign Ministry of the Foreign Ministry of the Dogy Foreign Ministry, sent an email on Saturday from his American agency for international development email address and laid the basis for reducing strength, the version of the government of dismissal. In an allusion to a certain language in the order of the Court of Appeal, Mr. Lewin wrote: “The team of Director Vouuggge and I will carry out an individual assessment that matches the stay of the DC Circuit, ensure that positions that are only unused are affected.”

Mr. Paoletta said in court files that he had worked with two other lawyers to carry out a unit for the consumer office unit and found that the office could work without 90 percent of its current staff.

“An approximately 200-person agency enables the office to fulfill its legal tasks and better match the priorities and management philosophy of the new leadership,” he said.

However, e -mails and other agency records show that until the moment the announcements were sent, the office officials were still discussing the figures. On Tuesday, before the messages ended, some workers believed to prepare materials, 485 workers would remain.

Trump officers wanted those who were carried out for the termination to be cut off by the agency's systems less than 24 hours after receiving their knowledge of discharge. A personnel worker involved in the planning asked a manager like people who do not see the travel and their e -mails, before the loss of access about the discharge was informed.

“A lot of people asked this question. Nobody really makes themselves a matter of making decisions,” the manager replied. “It makes me sad.”

In legal explanations of more than 100 pages, the department heads – provided the information that the Trump officials did not consult the shots – and other employees made the dismissals as ruthless and with mistakes.

The one person who had left Mr. Paoletta in the office for soldiers, a legally obliged unit who supported military employees, had already accepted the government's resigned resignation and would retire in September. He had submitted his work equipment and lost access to agency systems, according to the workers – which means that the office would no longer be excited if the shots continued.

The head of another legally required department said that he and all his workers had received termination note, although Mr. Paolettas had been maintained that a worker had been retained.

“If there is such a person, this person has not turned to me or as far as I know to others in my office to understand how we fulfill our legal mandate,” said the department head.