DWP does not pay over 350,000 women's earnings in the new scandal

The department for work and pensions (DWP) tries to assess historical underpayments of state pensions due to the protective scheme for responsibilities in home responsibility, since new revelations indicate that only a small fraction of the money owed have received what they are due.

The DWP has recognized that despite the sending of letters to 370,000 potential applicants, only 12,379 cases of residues were identified, which was only paid for 104 million GBP – a fraction of the 1.1 billion GBP originally valued for the ammand.

Protection of the home responsibility: another historical confusion

The fundamental problem at the center of this failure lies in the complexity of the protective scheme for protection at home, which ran from 1986 to 2010. Taking into account the national insurance contributions of those who took time for the care of children or relatives, affected women, many of whom were not only transported with financial uncertainty, but also navolized administrator process.

The DWP's own results show that many older people lack the digital skills that are necessary to deal with the application process “Digital by Standard”, a requirement that hinders the needy by rightly asserting.

Steve Webb, former pension minister and leading advocate of the rights of the pensioners, criticized the government's approach. He noticed that it is discouraging that the efforts to identify and correct underpayments have largely missed those who urgently need help.

“Writing letters to older people who lead them to a two-stage online process has always been a low success rate,” said Webb and underlined the state supervision of the challenges that older demographies face in a digital age.

At best, the DWP answer was inadequate

Closing this problem is the widespread skepticism that surrounds this correspondence. Many recipients confused government letters for fraud, while others were not sure of their justification or were worried that it was “too late” to change their situations.

This lack of trust is particularly relevant in a society that is increasingly prepared for online fraud and to which older people are more susceptible. In addition, the confusion of the connection between previous children's achievements and the current state pension claims does not realize many that they are redefined to pay the payments of an average of 7,800 GBP per person.

This inadequate public relations work has led to a growing gap of non -accused cases. The latest reports indicate that the entire cumulative outpasses could exceed 3 billion GBP about the death of over 200,000 people.

With an increasing outpayment rate, urgent measures are now required in around 6% of the state pension claims to correct these payment errors, but also to revise the systems that maintain them. Historical administrative errors have catalyzed this ongoing problem. The DWP has been checking almost 878,000 cases since January 2021, but the complete resolution may not be achieved until 2027.

While the government initiated a correction exercise, similar initiatives have not achieved any sustainable improvements in the past. The national pension framework must be re -evaluated to ensure that such an abundance is not repeated.

Chaos for older women

The public account of the parliament's public committee of Parliament has examined the handling of pension files by the DWP and identified systemic errors as a critical obstacle for the effective solution of outpasses. It has become clear that more robust protective measures and clearer communication are more important to protect endangered groups – especially women who have historically supported the main load of these administrative failure.

In view of these circumstances, Fleur Iannazzo, an expert in money cavity, encouraged potentially affected people to take immediate measures. “Anyone who believes that due to a lack of protection years for the responsibilities at home, he has underpaid his state pension,” should act now, “she advised.

The support is available from the DWP helpline. However, it is crucial for justified pensioners to consult trustworthy friends or relatives in order to navigate the complexity of the application process.

The protective gap at home is not just a bureaucratic mistake. It represents years of financial struggles for thousands of people who trust a system who is supposed to protect their livelihood. While this situation unfolds, the demand for the DWP to reform its practices will be louder. It is an urgent memory that the well -being of minors should always have priority with bureaucratic convenience to ensure that each individual receives not only their charges, but also the dignity associated with it.

Selected picture on the Canaries