close
close

Taylor Swift summons in Justin Baldoni -Blake Lively Battle – National

Justin Baldoni's lawyers have withdrawn a summon It ends with us The continued legal dispute of the actor with co-star Blake LIVELY.

Swift, who deals closely with LIVELY, was mentioned in connection with the ongoing legal case between the co-stars when the text exchange was unveiled, which in January contained its name in Baldonis $ 400-billion slander-in suit against Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds.

Lawyers for Swift and Lively have previously submitted applications to revoke the summons that was issued at the beginning of this month.

Lively's spokesman previously said that Baldoni tried to “use” the pop star as a witness in the case of “using” name to “use public interest”.

“We are pleased that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties Taylor Swift and their law firm have withdrawn their harassing lectures,” said the spokesman for a change on May 22.

The story continues under the advertisement

“We have supported the efforts of Taylor's team to lift these inappropriate lectures aimed at their lawyer, and we will continue to work for third parties who are wrongly harassed or threatened.”

“The Baldoni and Wayfarer team tried to set Taylor Swift, a woman who has been an inspiration for tens of millions around the world since the first day,” added Livive speakers.

“In view of the justification in front of a federal court, they folded. At some point, the distractions will assume that the actual demands for sexual harassment and retaliatory measures with which they are confronted,” concluded the explanation.


Click here to play video: 'Taylor Swift in charge to testify to Blake Lively Livelyin Baldoni Test'


Taylor Swift in charge to testify in Blake Lively Lively-Justin Baldoni Trial


Since the beginning of the legal dispute, the Baldoni legal team has made it public on a website with the title The Litlich -Info, which he created to defend it, text messages from LIVELY and REYNOLDS.

The story continues under the advertisement

In his case, the 41-year-old Baldoni also shared a changed complaint against Lively, Reynolds, the PR company of LIVELY and the New York Times, as well as a 168-page document with the name “Timeline of Relevice Events” in connection with the case and the production of the film.

For messages that influence Canada and all over the world, register notifications for Breaking News that will be delivered directly when you enter.

Get national news

For messages that influence Canada and all over the world, register notifications for Breaking News that will be delivered directly when you enter.

The timeline contains e -mails and text messages that were allegedly sent before and during the films of the film.


Text messages between Lively and Baldoni, in which she apparently alludes as “one of her dragons”, were published in February. Swift and Lively have been very close friends since 2015 and the pop star is the godmother of LIVELY children.

According to Variety, the lectures on Swift and their legal team did not seem to be connected to these specific text messages.

Bryan Freedman, Baldonis lawyer, said Gossip Actor, according to a jurisdiction respected by the outlet. (Global news did not look at the document independently.)

Freedman claimed that on February 14th he received a voiceemail from “a person who is very closely connected to Taylor Swift”. However, he refused to identify the person, but claimed that LIVELY's lawyer had asked that the 35-year-old singer published an explanation to support LIVELY on social media and warned that he could publish text messages between the couple for 10 years.

The story continues under the advertisement

Freedman also claimed that Swift Lively's lawyers accused the lawyers of blackmails.

The non -identified person also claimed that Lively Swift had wiped out several months earlier several months earlier.

Freedman said the summons should receive the supposedly blackmail conversation in a letter to LIVELY's lawyer.

The lawyers of LIVELY called Freedman's allegations “clearly and demonstrably wrong”.

Swift's legal team previously said that if you were in charge, Swift did not have any information for the legal dispute and should not be involved in the case.

“Taylor Swift never put on the set of this film, she was not involved in casting or creative decisions, she did not evaluate the film, she never saw an editing or made notes to the film, she didn't even see It ends with us To weeks after his public publication and traveled the biggest tour in history for the globe in 2023 and 2024, ”said her spokesman on May 9th.

The story continues under the advertisement

Swift's team said My tears plump.

“In view of the fact that their participation was to licensing a song for the film that 19 other artists also did, this document load is designed in such a way that it uses the name of Taylor Swift to arouse the public interest by creating boulevard clickbait instead of concentrating on the facts of the case,” said the speaker.

The LIVELY legal team published an explanation after Swift's potential participation in the case was spread. It is said that Baldoni and his legal team “continue to transform a case of sexual harassment and retaliation in entertainment for the tabloids”.

“This is a very serious legal issue, not the circus of Barnum & Bailey,” said the spokesman. “The accused continue to push in public, shame, shape and attack the rights and reputation of women.”

The story continues under the advertisement

The legal proceedings by Baldoni and Lively is set in New York City for March 2026.

Curator recommendations

  • Canadian brand Spotlight series: Get to know Monos

  • 10 RoadTrip activities for which no screens are required

& Copy 2025 Global News, Department of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Leave a Comment