Apple Stock sinks to Trump after Trump has threatened 25% tariff if iPhones are not achieved in the USA

The Apple shares fell 3% on Friday after President Donald Trump threatened the Tech -Riese with a tariff of 25% if he did not start producing iPhones in the United States -his youngest Salvo, who aimed directly at a US company, as his business is doing.

In a contribution about his social platform on Friday morning in the truth, Trump wrote that he had said “Tim Cook from Apple a long time ago that I would expect your iPhone to be sold in the United States of America that are not built in the USA, not in India or in a different place”.

“If this is not the case, a tariff of at least 25% of Apple must be paid to the USA,” said Trump.

Apple has declined about 20% to date, since Trump's threats against the concerns regarding the Tech -Riese proceed with the AI race.

In the remarks on the press in the early Friday afternoon, Trump made it clear that every tariff raised for Apple would also apply to devices that were imported by companies such as Samsung “and any other company that produces this product”.

“Otherwise it would not be fair,” said Trump, adding that such a tariff could be implemented by the end of June.

“If you build your plant here, there is no tariff,” continued Trump. He said he believed that with Cook he would come to an “understanding” that he would not keep the iPhone production overseas. The tariff, as Trump stated, was a reaction to the fact that Apple continued to do so.

An Apple spokesman declined to comment on CNBC. Financial Times reported less than 24 hours earlier that Apple had completed plans for a 1.5 billion dollar production center for iPhone components in India.

Trump also recorded the threat of a ceiling 50% suspicion in the European Union and said that trade negotiations with the region were “nowhere”.

This post sent broader markets into a deeper negative area. The S&P 500 ended the day by 0.67% at its first weekly loss in one month.

After an apparent doldrum that made it possible for us to compensate for or extinguish the stocks that had suffered the losses that they had suffered against the announcement of the “Freedom Day” since his shock.

In the late afternoon, he announced his blessing for a deal between us Stahl and Nippon Steel. He supposedly leaned a ban during the campaign. The stocks of the US steel rose by 20% in the news

In a statement, the international president of United Steel Workers, David McCall, said. “We cannot speculate about the effects of today's announcement without further information.”

“Our concern remains that Nippon, a foreign company with a long and proven success balance sheet to violate our trade laws, will continue to undermine domestic steel manufacturing capacity and endanger thousands of good jobs.”

President usually avoid lending individual corporate strategies, but Trump broke this standard. Instead, he started to increase direct attacks against US companies, the answers of which he does not like, including Amazon, Mattel and Walmart.

His targeting of Apple can be a more serious threat. Trump had recently signaled his displeasure with Apple CEO Tim Cook.

“I had a little problem with Tim Cook yesterday,” he told members of the media last week. “I said to him: 'My friend, I treated you very well. You come here with $ 500 billion, but now I hear that you can build all over India.' I don't want you to build in India. “

In an appearance in Fox News, Finance Minister Scott Bessent explained Trump's writing and said that he had “tried to bring precision production back to the United States

“And I think one of our biggest weaknesses … this external production, especially in semiconductors, and a large part of the Apple's components are in semiconductors. So we want Apple to help us find the semiconductor chain safer.

Since the effects of Trump's tariffs, which continue to include a flat -rate tax of 10% and effective tariffs of around 40% on Chinese goods, has increasingly focused on US companies, Trump has increasingly focused on her answers.

Last week, President Walmart beat up for the fact that he would probably increase prices for buyers within weeks and demanded that the retail trade “eat the tariffs”.

The conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board mocked this move as potentially “Marxist” efforts to tell a company how he runs his business, “together with a vague, implicit threat from retaliation”. It was said that Trump was “full of Kamala Harris” and referred to the anti-Price-gouning plan of his 2024 campaign and added: “How would Mr. Trump react if the congress told him how much his family could raise for a fee of Mar-A-Lago?”

Walmart then made an explanation that is about “keeping the prices as low as possible as long as we can indicate the reality of small retail margins”. In the following days, several other large consumer brands seemed to be on the tips of the toe with regard to price matters. Target said on Wednesday that charging customers would be more.

At the beginning of this month, Trump Barbie Maker Mattel threatened with a “100% tariff” on the toy if it was not shifted production in the US Mattel that it would probably still be forced to adapt the prices in the United States and that it did not predict to re -form its production.

And last month, administrative officers described a report that Amazon would start labeling tariffs at the cash register, an “enemy and political act”, with Trump personally asked Jeff Bezos to complain. Hours later, Amazon tried to downplay the scope of his plan – and then said it was completely off the table.

As for Apple, at least half of its iPhones is produced in China. In April Reuters reported that Apple had started to move the entire iPhone production to India by the end of 2026.

New iPhones cost around 1,199 US dollars. Wall Street analysts have various estimates for what an iPhone made in America would cost, worth $ 1,500 to $ 3,500, depending on how much of its Apple supply chain can ultimately convert.

In a reference to the customers on Friday after Trump's post, Wedbush Securities Managing Director Dan Ives, who first stated the estimate of $ 3,500 in April, the idea of US-Made-Maten cell phone as a “fairy tale”. He said he thought that Apple would continue to try to negotiate with the administration in order to come to a solution.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply